Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19403705›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of nutrition2009

Dietary fructose and glucose differentially affect lipid and glucose homeostasis.

Ernst J Schaefer, Joi A Gleason, Michael L Dansinger

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Exchanging carbohydrate or protein for fat improves lipid-related cardiovascular risk profile in overweight men and women when consumed ad libitum.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2010
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ernst J SchaeferJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA. ernst.schaefer@tufts.edu
Joi A Gleason
Michael L Dansinger
Tufts University · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

Weight Loss, Inflammation, and Vascular RemodelingP50HL083813 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WELTY, FRANCINE K · 2006 to 2015
$13.0M
Pharmacogenetics of the Statin ResponseR01HL074753 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SCHAEFER, ERNST JOHN · 2003 to 2006
$3.1M
MOLECULAR BASIS OF HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN DEFICIENCYR01HL060935 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SCHAEFER, ERNST JOHN · 1999 to 2009
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 74753NHLBI NIH HHS P050HL083813NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL-60935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Absorbed glucose and fructose differ in that glucose largely escapes first-pass removal by the liver, whereas fructose does not, resulting in different metabolic effects of these 2 monosaccharides. In short-term controlled feeding studies, dietary fructose significantly increases postprandial triglyceride (TG) levels and has little effect on serum glucose concentrations, whereas dietary glucose has the opposite effects. When dietary glucose and fructose have been directly compared at approximately 20-25% of energy over a 4- to 6-wk period, dietary fructose caused significant increases in fasting TG and LDL cholesterol concentrations, whereas dietary glucose did not, but dietary glucose did increase serum glucose and insulin concentrations in the postprandial state whereas dietary fructose did not. When fructose at 30-60 g ( approximately 4-12% of energy) was added to the diet in the free-living state, there were no significant effects on lipid or glucose biomarkers. Sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) contain approximately equal amounts of fructose and glucose and no metabolic differences between them have been noted. Controlled feeding studies at more physiologic dietary intakes of fructose and glucose need to be conducted. In our view, to decrease the current high prevalence of obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and diabetes, the focus should be on restricting the intake of excess energy, sucrose, HFCS, and animal and trans fats and increasing exercise and the intake of vegetables, vegetable oils, fish, fruit, whole grains, and fiber.

Indexed as

DietDietary CarbohydratesFructosamineGlucoseHomeostasisHumansLipidsLipoproteinsDietary CarbohydratesFructosamineGlucoseLipidsLipoproteins

Identifiers

PMID19403705
PMCPMC2682989
OpenAlexW2151930110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.