Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19403702›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmacology2009

Cisplatin-induced DNA damage activates replication checkpoint signaling components that differentially affect tumor cell survival.

Jill M Wagner, Larry M Karnitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Exploring new quinoxaline, quinoline, and naphthalene carboxamides as HDAC-targeted anticancer agents: Cytotoxicity, enzymatic HDAC evaluation, and in silico studies.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Loss of NSE-4 Perturbs Genome Stability and DNA Repair inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. The Employment of GeneraNutrients · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jill M WagnerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics and Division of Oncology Research, Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Larry M Karnitz
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

ANALYSIS OF A DNA DAMAGE INDUCIBLE CHECKPOINT COMPLEXR01CA084321 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KARNITZ, LARRY M · 2000 to 2008
$2.2M
Analysis of a DNA Damage-Inducible Checkpoint ComplexR56CA084321 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KARNITZ, LARRY M · 2009 to 2009
$271k
NCI NIH HHS CA084321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin and other platinating agents are some of the most widely used chemotherapy agents. These drugs exert their antiproliferative effects by creating intrastrand and interstrand DNA cross-links, which block DNA replication. The cross-links mobilize signaling and repair pathways, including the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1-ATR-Chk1 pathway, a pathway that helps tumor cells survive the DNA damage inflicted by many chemotherapy agents. Here we show that Rad9 and ATR play critical roles in helping tumor cells survive cisplatin treatment. However, depleting Chk1 with small interfering RNA or inhibiting Chk1 with 3-(carbamoylamino)-5-(3-fluorophenyl)-N-(3-piperidyl)thiophene-2-carboxamide (AZD7762) did not sensitize these cells to cisplatin, oxaliplatin, or carboplatin. Moreover, when Rad18, Rad51, BRCA1, BRCA2, or FancD2 was disabled, Chk1 depletion did not further sensitize the cells to cisplatin. In fact, Chk1 depletion reversed the sensitivity seen when Rad18 was disabled. Collectively, these studies suggest that the pharmacological manipulation of Chk1 may not be an effective strategy to sensitize tumors to platinating agents.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCheckpoint Kinase 1CisplatinDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesS PhaseAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanCisplatinProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasesrad9 protein

Identifiers

PMID19403702
PMCPMC2701464
OpenAlexW2154041044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.