Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19403700›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2009

Anterograde microtubule transport drives microtubule bending in LLC-PK1 epithelial cells.

Andrew D Bicek, Erkan Tüzel, Aleksey Demtchouk, Maruti Uppalapati, William O Hancock, Daniel M Kroll, David J Odde

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Kinesin-Induced Buckling Reveals the Limits of Microtubule Self-Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanical fatigue in microtubules.Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microtubules in Pancreatic β Cells: Convoluted Roadways Toward Precision.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew D BicekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Mathematics and Its Applications, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Erkan Tüzel
Aleksey Demtchouk
Maruti Uppalapati
William O Hancock
Daniel M Kroll
David J Odde
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USNorth Dakota State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubules (MTs) have been proposed to act mechanically as compressive struts that resist both actomyosin contractile forces and their own polymerization forces to mechanically stabilize cell shape. To identify the origin of MT bending, we directly observed MT bending and F-actin transport dynamics in the periphery of LLC-PK1 epithelial cells. We found that F-actin is nearly stationary in these cells even as MTs are deformed, demonstrating that MT bending is not driven by actomyosin contractility. Furthermore, the inhibition of myosin II activity through the use of blebbistatin results in microtubules that are still dynamically bending. In addition, as determined by fluorescent speckle microscopy, MT polymerization rarely results, if ever, in bending. We suppressed dynamic instability using nocodazole, and we observed no qualitative change in the MT bending dynamics. Bending most often results from anterograde transport of proximal portions of the MT toward a nearly stationary distal tip. Interestingly, we found that in an in vitro kinesin-MT gliding assay, MTs buckle in a similar manner. To make quantitative comparisons, we measured curvature distributions of observed MTs and found that the in vivo and in vitro curvature distributions agree quantitatively. In addition, the measured MT curvature distribution is not Gaussian, as expected for a thermally driven semiflexible polymer, indicating that thermal forces play a minor role in MT bending. We conclude that many of the known mechanisms of MT deformation, such as polymerization and acto-myosin contractility, play an inconsequential role in mediating MT bending in LLC-PK1 cells and that MT-based molecular motors likely generate most of the strain energy stored in the MT lattice. The results argue against models in which MTs play a major mechanical role in LLC-PK1 cells and instead favor a model in which mechanical forces control the spatial distribution of the MT array.

Indexed as

ActinsActomyosinAnimalsBiological AssayBiological TransportBiomechanical PhenomenaCell LineCell SurvivalDrosophila melanogasterEpithelial CellsKymographyMicrotubulesModels, BiologicalMolecular Motor ProteinsSus scrofaActinsActomyosinMolecular Motor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19403700
PMCPMC2695801
OpenAlexW2101370648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.