ArticleBMC family practice2009
The Rourke Baby Record Infant/Child Maintenance Guide: do doctors use it, do they find it useful, and does using it improve their well-baby visit records?
Article in BMC family practice, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Framework for systems of pediatric well-care visits: a scoping review.BMC global and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Whole milk compared with reduced-fat milk and childhood overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2020Pooled it
- Big Ideas Soapbox: Top 3 proposals presented at Family Medicine Forum 2025.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of Refugee Children's Health Conditions, Outcomes, and Measures Used in Refugee-Serving Public Health Centres/Clinics in Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Implementing an Early Detection Program for Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Polish Primary Healthcare Setting-Possible Obstacles and Experiences from Online ASD Screening.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Knowledge mobilization for primary care: Lessons learned from 40 years of the Rourke Baby Record.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Scope of Practice and Principles of Care of Naturopathic Medicine in North America: A Commentary.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The 2020 Rourke Baby Record release: A time for reflection and looking forward.Paediatrics & child health · 2021Article
- The quality of preventive care for pre-school aged children in Australian general practice.BMC medicine · 2019Article
- Review
- Rourke Baby Record 2017: Clinical update for preventive care of children up to 5 years of age.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019Review
- Paediatric vision screening in the primary care setting in Ontario.Paediatrics & child health · 2018Article
- Evaluation of the revised Nipissing District Developmental Screening (NDDS) tool for use in general population samples of infants and children.BMC pediatrics · 2016Article
- Rourke Baby Record 2014: Evidence-based tool for the health of infants and children from birth to age 5.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015Review
- Management of neonatal jaundice varies by practitioner type.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Article
- Getting it right from birth to kindergarten: what's new in the Rourke Baby Record?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Article
- Investigation of test characteristics of two screening tools in comparison with a gold standard assessment to detect developmental delay at 36 months: A pilot study.Paediatrics & child health · 2012Article
- Update on well-baby and well-child care from 0 to 5 years: What's new in the Rourke Baby Record?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Rourke Baby Record (RBR) - http://www.rourkebabyrecord.ca - is a freely available evidence-based structured form for child health surveillance from zero to five years. Family physicians/general practitioners (FP/GPs) doing office based well-baby care in three Ontario Canada cities (London, Ottawa, and Toronto) were randomly sampled to study the prevalence and utility of the RBR and documentation of well-baby visits.
methodsDatabase with telephone confirmation was conducted to assess the prevalence of use of the RBR. Study Part 1: Questionnaire mailed to a random sample of 100 RBR users. Outcome measures were utility of, helpfulness of, and suggestions for the RBR. Descriptive analysis was employed. Study Part 2: Retrospective chart review of well-baby visits by 38 FP/GPs using student t-tests and factor analysis. Outcome measures were well-baby visit documentation of growth, nutrition, safety issues, developmental milestones, physical examination, and overall comprehensiveness.
resultsThe RBR was used by 78.5% (402/512) of successfully contacted FP/GPs who did well-baby care in these 3 cities. Study Part 1: Questionnaire respondents (N = 41/100) used the RBR in several ways, and found it most helpful for assessing healthy child development, charting/recording the visits, managing time effectively, addressing parent concerns, identifying health problems, and identifying high risk situations. The RBR was seen to be least helpful as a tool for managing or for referring identified health problems. Study Part 2: Charts from a total of 1,378 well-baby visits on 176 children were audited. Well-baby care provided by the 20 FP/GPs who used the RBR compared to that by the 18 non-users was statistically more likely to include documentation of type of feeding (p = 0.023), discussion of safety issues (p < 0.001), assessment of development (p = 0.001), and overall comprehensiveness (p < 0.001). Well-baby care provided by the RBR users compared to that by the non-users was not more likely to include documentation of measurement of growth (p = 0.097), or physical examination (p = 0.828).
conclusionThe RBR was widely used by FP/GPs in these settings. RBR users found it helpful for many purposes, and had a consistently high rate of documentation of many aspects of well-baby care. The Rourke Baby Record has become a de facto gold standard clinical practice tool in knowledge translation for pediatric preventive medicine and health surveillance for primary care pediatric providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.