ArticleInternational journal of radiation biology2009
Imaging of radiation effects on cellular 26S proteasome function in situ.
Article in International journal of radiation biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cypin regulates K63-linked polyubiquitination to shape synaptic content.Science advances · 2025Article
- Adaptation of the Tumor Antigen Presentation Machinery to Ionizing Radiation.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023Article
- T Cells Contribute to Pathological Responses in the Non-Targeted Rat Heart following Irradiation of the Kidneys.Toxics · 2022Article
- Host mediated inflammatory influence on glioblastoma multiforme recurrence following high-dose ionizing radiation.PloS one · 2017Article
- Degron protease blockade sensor to image epigenetic histone protein methylation in cells and living animals.ACS chemical biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe classical radiobiological paradigm is that DNA is the target for cell damage caused by ionising radiation. However, evidence is accumulating that other constituents, such as the membrane, organelles, and proteins, are also important targets. We have shown that the isolated 26S proteasome is one such target and here we wish to substantiate it within the cell, in situ. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used confocal microscopy to quantitatively detect and subcellularly localise radiation-induced 26S proteasome inhibition in cells expressing an ornithine decarboxylase degron that targets a fused Zoanthus species green (ZsGreen) fluorescent protein reporter specifically to the 26S proteasome.
resultsExposure of cells to a range of radiation doses, even as low as 0.05 Gy inhibited 26S activity within minutes. Initially, punctate nuclear ZsGreen fluorescence was observed that became cytoplasmic after seven hours -- a pattern distinct from the diffuse homogeneous fluorescence of cells incubated in the conventional proteasome inhibitor MG-132.
conclusionsOur study clearly indicates that the 26S proteasome is a radiation target with physiological consequences and introduces a new perspective in mechanistic investigations of cellular responses to stresses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.