Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19401825›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2010

A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures.

Ming Liu, Zhiming Yang, Fuxing Pei, Fuguo Huang, Shiqiang Chen, Zhou Xiang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Peri-implant femoral fractures in hip fracture patients treated with osteosynthesis: a retrospective cohort study of 1965 patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  17. A new perspective towards failure of gamma nail systems.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhiming Yang
Fuxing Pei
Fuguo Huang
Shiqiang Chen
Zhou Xiang
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the fixation outcome of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in treating peritrochanteric fractures. Relevant randomised controlled studies were included, and the search strategy followed the requirements of the Cochrane Library Handbook. Methodological quality was assessed and data were extracted independently. Seven studies involving 1,257 fractures were included which compared the effect of the Gamma nail and DHS. The results showed a higher rate of postoperative femoral shaft fracture with the Gamma nail compared to the DHS [relative risk (RR): 7.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.83-18.70, P < 0.0001] but no statistical differences in wound infection (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.56-1.86), mortality (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.81-1.24), re-operation (RR: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.91-2.95) and walking independently after rehabilitation (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.60-1.33). It seemed that there were no obvious advantages of the Gamma nail over the DHS in treating peritrochanteric fractures.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone ScrewsFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHip FracturesHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReoperationSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeWalking

Identifiers

PMID19401825
PMCPMC2899291
OpenAlexW2014073240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.