Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19401823›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2009

Plant-based oral vaccines: results of human trials.

C O Tacket

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Inducing Mucosal IgA: A Challenge for Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2017
    Review
  11. Edible plants for oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  12. Mucosal vaccine delivery: Current state and a pediatric perspective.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Combination vaccines against diarrheal diseases.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Immunology of gut mucosal vaccines.Immunological reviews · 2011
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Plant-made vaccines for humans and animals.Plant biotechnology journal · 2010
    Review
  20. Vaccines in veterinary medicine: a brief review of history and technology.The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C O TacketCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 685 West Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. ctacket@medicine.umaryland.edu

Funding

ENTERIC PATHOGENS - MUCOSAL RESEARCH UNIT-266965299N01AI065299 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALT PR · 1996 to 2003
$1.0M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR165001NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-65299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines consisting of transgenic plant-derived antigens offer a new strategy for development of safe, inexpensive vaccines. The vaccine antigens can be eaten with the edible part of the plant or purified from plant material. In phase 1 clinical studies of prototype potato- and corn-based vaccines, these vaccines have been safe and immunogenic without the need for a buffer or vehicle other than the plant cell. Transgenic plant technology is attractive for vaccine development because these vaccines are needle-less, stable, and easy to administer. This chapter examines some early human studies of oral transgenic plant-derived vaccines against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection, norovirus, and hepatitis B.

Indexed as

Administration, OralClinical Trials as TopicEscherichia coli VaccinesHumansPlants, Genetically ModifiedSolanum tuberosumVaccines, SubunitViral VaccinesZea maysEscherichia coli VaccinesVaccines, SubunitViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19401823
PMCPMC7121496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.