Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19401703›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2009

International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee.

P F Ambros, I M Ambros, G M Brodeur, M Haber, J Khan, A Nakagawara, G Schleiermacher, F Speleman, R Spitz, W B London and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01728155 (European Low and Intermediate Risk Neuroblastoma Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 187 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01728155 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

European Low and Intermediate Risk Neuroblastoma Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La FeRan2011Enrolled685ConditionsLOW AND INTERMEDIATE PAEDIATRIC NEUROBLASTOMA AND NEONATAL SUPRARENAL MASSESArmschemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 398 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guidelines for cytogenetic investigations in tumours.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Incorporation of high-doseJournal of hematology & oncology · 2017
    Trial
  4. Solid tumors of childhood display specific serum microRNA profiles.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Circulating Beta3-Adrenoreceptor as Novel Independent Biomarker for Risk Assessment in Neuroblastoma Patients.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A head-to-head prospective comparative analysis ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

P F AmbrosCCRI, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria. ambros@ccri.at
I M Ambros
G M Brodeur
M Haber
J Khan
A Nakagawara
G Schleiermacher
F Speleman
R Spitz
W B London
S L Cohn
A D J Pearson
J M Maris
Community College of Rhode Island · USChiba Cancer Center · JPChildren's Cancer Institute Australia · AUChildren's Oncology Group · USGhent University Hospital · BEInstitut Curie · FRInstitute of Cancer Research · GBNational Cancer Institute · USPhiladelphia University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

BIOINFORMATICS: SYSTEMS BIOLOGY OF PEDIATRIC CANCERSZIABC011002 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KHAN, JAVED · 2009 to 2025
$9.3M
Predicting Response Prognosis in Pediatric CancersZIASC010366 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI KHAN, JAVED · 2009 to 2025
$4.7M
Identification of Genes for Predicting Prognosis in Pediatric CancersZ01SC010366 · SC · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI KHAN, JAVED · 2001 to 2008
$550k
Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroblastoma serves as a paradigm for utilising tumour genomic data for determining patient prognosis and treatment allocation. However, before the establishment of the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force in 2004, international consensus on markers, methodology, and data interpretation did not exist, compromising the reliability of decisive genetic markers and inhibiting translational research efforts. The objectives of the INRG Biology Committee were to identify highly prognostic genetic aberrations to be included in the new INRG risk classification schema and to develop precise definitions, decisive biomarkers, and technique standardisation. The review of the INRG database (n=8800 patients) by the INRG Task Force finally enabled the identification of the most significant neuroblastoma biomarkers. In addition, the Biology Committee compared the standard operating procedures of different cooperative groups to arrive at international consensus for methodology, nomenclature, and future directions. Consensus was reached to include MYCN status, 11q23 allelic status, and ploidy in the INRG classification system on the basis of an evidence-based review of the INRG database. Standardised operating procedures for analysing these genetic factors were adopted, and criteria for proper nomenclature were developed. Neuroblastoma treatment planning is highly dependant on tumour cell genomic features, and it is likely that a comprehensive panel of DNA-based biomarkers will be used in future risk assignment algorithms applying genome-wide techniques. Consensus on methodology and interpretation is essential for uniform INRG classification and will greatly facilitate international and cooperative clinical and translational research studies.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17Gene AmplificationGenetic MarkersHumansInternational CooperationNeuroblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNuclear ProteinsOncogene ProteinsPatient Care PlanningPloidiesPrognosisProtein BiosynthesisRisk AssessmentGenetic MarkersMYCN protein, humanN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNuclear ProteinsOncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19401703
PMCPMC2694415
OpenAlexW2033037904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.