Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19401702›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2009

Analysis of differential gene expression in colorectal cancer and stroma using fluorescence-activated cell sorting purification.

M J Smith, A C Culhane, M Donovan, J C Coffey, B D Barry, M A Kelly, D G Higgins, J H Wang, W O Kirwan, T G Cotter and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep Learning-Assisted Label-Free Parallel Cell Sorting with Digital Microfluidics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adipocyte-derived endotrophin promotes malignant tumor progression.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M J SmithDepartment of Academic Surgery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
A C Culhane
M Donovan
J C Coffey
B D Barry
M A Kelly
D G Higgins
J H Wang
W O Kirwan
T G Cotter
H P Redmond
University College Cork · IEDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour stroma gene expression in biopsy specimens may obscure the expression of tumour parenchyma, hampering the predictive power of microarrays. We aimed to assess the utility of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for generating cell populations for gene expression analysis and to compare the gene expression of FACS-purified tumour parenchyma to that of whole tumour biopsies. Single cell suspensions were generated from colorectal tumour biopsies and tumour parenchyma was separated using FACS. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting allowed reliable estimation and purification of cell populations, generating parenchymal purity above 90%. RNA from FACS-purified and corresponding whole tumour biopsies was hybridised to Affymetrix oligonucleotide microarrays. Whole tumour and parenchymal samples demonstrated differential gene expression, with 289 genes significantly overexpressed in the whole tumour, many of which were consistent with stromal gene expression (e.g., COL6A3, COL1A2, POSTN, TIMP2). Genes characteristic of colorectal carcinoma were overexpressed in the FACS-purified cells (e.g., HOX2D and RHOB). We found FACS to be a robust method for generating samples for gene expression analysis, allowing simultaneous assessment of parenchymal and stromal compartments. Gross stromal contamination may affect the interpretation of cancer gene expression microarray experiments, with implications for hypotheses generation and the stability of expression signatures used for predicting clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiopsyCell Adhesion MoleculesCell SeparationCollagenCollagen Type ICollagen Type VIColorectal NeoplasmsFlow CytometryGene Expression ProfilingHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA, NeoplasmStromal CellsTissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2Cell Adhesion MoleculesCollagenCollagen Type ICollagen Type VIPOSTN protein, humanRNA, NeoplasmTissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2

Identifiers

PMID19401702
PMCPMC2694425
OpenAlexW2028505689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.