Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19401541›Full record

ReviewMolecular interventions2009

Proteases display biased agonism at protease-activated receptors: location matters!

Angela Russo, Unice J K Soh, JoAnn Trejo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular interventions, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Biased signaling of protease-activated receptors.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2014
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela RussoDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Unice J K Soh
JoAnn Trejo
University of California, San Diego · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Regulation of Protease-activated Receptor-1 SignalingR01HL073328 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TREJO, JOANN · 2004 to 2012
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that transmit cellular responses begun by the actions of extracellular proteases. The activation of a PAR occurs by a unique mechanism whereby the extracellular N-terminal segment of the inactive receptor undergoes proteolytic cleavage, resulting in irreversible activation--unlike most GPCRs that are reversibly activated. PARs mediate cellular responses to coagulant proteases in various cell types localized within the vasculature. Additionally, PARs are expressed in other cell types and respond to a plethora of proteases. Recent studies have revealed that different proteases elicit distinct responses through the activation of the same PAR. This phenomenon appears to involve stabilization of distinct active PAR conformations that facilitates selectively coupling to different effectors and is localized to caveolae, a subtype of lipid rafts.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMultigene FamilyPeptide HydrolasesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein TransportReceptors, Proteinase-ActivatedSignal TransductionPeptide HydrolasesReceptors, Proteinase-Activated

Identifiers

PMID19401541
PMCPMC3139377
OpenAlexW1978955943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.