Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19401404›Full record

ArticlePhysiological genomics2009

Individual molecular response to elevated intraocular pressure in perfused postmortem human eyes.

Núria Comes, Teresa Borrás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Vitamin D and Ocular Diseases: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Small Heat Shock Proteins in Retinal Diseases.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The SPARC-related modular calcium binding protein 2 (Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
    Article
  19. An In Vitro Perfusion System to Enhance Outflow Studies in Mouse Eyes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Núria ComesDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7041, USA.
Teresa Borrás

Funding

REGULATION OF OUTFLOW FACILITY BY GENE TRANSFERR01EY011906 · NEI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BORRAS, TERESA · 1997 to 2016
$5.6M
PRESSURE REGULATION OF HUMAN TRABECULAR MESHWORK GENESR01EY013126 · NEI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BORRAS, TERESA · 2000 to 2012
$4.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY-11906NEI NIH HHS EY-13126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the major risk factor for glaucoma. In the clinic, the response to elevated pressure and thus the risk for development of glaucoma differs among individuals. We took advantage of our ability to subject postmortem human eyes from the same individual to physiological and elevated pressure in a perfused outflow model and compared individual patterns of gene expression under pressure. The architecture of the trabecular meshwork, tissue responsible for the maintenance of IOP, was conserved. We performed two sets of experiments. The first set (n = 5, 10 eyes) used Affymetrix GeneChips, identified the 20 most pressure-altered genes in each individual, and compared their pressure response in the other four. The second set (n = 5, 10 eyes) selected 21 relevant trabecular meshwork genes and examined, by real-time TaqMan-PCR, the rank of their abundance and of their pressure differential expression in each individual. The majority of the up- and downregulated top-changers of each individual showed an individual response trend. Few genes were general responders. Individual responders included STATH, FBN2, TF, OGN, IL6, IGF1, CRYAB, and ELAM1 (marker for glaucoma). General responders included MMP1, MMP10, CXCL2, and PDPN. In addition, we found that although the relative abundance of selected genes was very similar among nonstressed individuals, the response to pressure of those same genes had a marked individual component. Our results offer the first molecular insight on the variation of the individual response to IOP observed in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansImmunohistochemistryIntraocular PressureOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTrabecular Meshwork

Identifiers

PMID19401404
PMCPMC2712225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.