Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19401291›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2009

Uptake of aluminium into Arabidopsis root cells measured by fluorescent lifetime imaging.

Olga Babourina, Zed Rengel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Two-Photon Imaging in Plants.Plant & cell physiology · 2021
    Review
  2. Tissue ionome response to rhizosphere pH and aluminum in tea plants (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Root apex transition zone as oscillatory zone.Frontiers in plant science · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olga BabourinaSchool of Earth and Geographical Sciences M087, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. olgab@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Zed Rengel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMeasuring the Al(3+) uptake rate across the plasma membrane of intact root cells is crucial for understanding the mechanisms and time-course of Al toxicity in plants. However, a reliable method with the sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to estimate Al(3+) uptake in intact root cells does not exist.

methodsIn the current study, fluorescent lifetime imaging (FLIM) analysis was used to quantify Al(3+) uptake in the root-cell cytoplasm in vivo. This was performed via the estimation of the fluorescence lifetime of Al-lumogallion {5-chloro-3[(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)azo]-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid} complexes and measurements of intracellular pH while exposing arabidopsis seedlings to acidic and Al(3+) stresses. KEY

resultsThe lifetime of Al-lumogallion complexes fluorescence is pH-dependent. The primary sites for Al(3+) entry are the meristem and distal elongation zones, while Al(3+) uptake via the cortex and epidermis of the mature root zone is limited. The maximum rates of Al uptake into the cytoplasm (2-3 micromol m(-3) min(-1) for the meristematic root zone and 3-7 micromol m(-3) min(-1) for the mature zone) were observed after a 30-min exposure to 100 microM AlCl(3) (pH 4.2). Intracellular Al concentration increased to 0.4 microM Al within the first 3 h of exposure to 100 microM AlCl(3).

conclusionsFLIM analysis of the fluorescence of Al-lumogallion complexes can be used to reliably quantify Al uptake in the cytoplasm of intact root cells at the initial stages of Al(3+) stress.

Indexed as

AluminumArabidopsisHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMicroscopy, FluorescencePlant RootsAluminum

Identifiers

PMID19401291
PMCPMC2706735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.