ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2009
Measuring the impact and distress of osteoarthritis from the patients' perspective.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Staging of mobility, transfer and walking functions of elderly persons based on the codes of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.BMC geriatrics · 2013Trial
- Provider REport of Sustainment Scale (PRESS): development and validation of a brief measure of inner context sustainment.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- Patient-reported outcome measures in osteoarthritis: a systematic search and review of their use and psychometric properties.RMD open · 2018Article
- Turkish version of the Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire: assessment of reliability and validity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016Article
- Multidimensional fatigue inventory and post-polio syndrome - a Rasch analysis.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2015Article
- Toward a clinical definition of early osteoarthritis: onset of patient-reported knee pain begins on stairs. Data from the osteoarthritis initiative.Arthritis care & research · 2015Observational
- Depression, quality of life and primary care: a cross-sectional study.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2013Observational
- Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2013Article
- Rasch analysis of the intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) scale.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2012Article
- An exploratory study of the perceived impact of health problems of landmine/UXO victims versus another disability group.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2012Article
- Analysis of internal construct validity of the SRS-24 questionnaire.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the internal construct validity of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP), a patient based outcome measure based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which assesses impact and distress, in an osteoarthritis (OA) cohort.
methodsA questionnaire comprising the 23-item PIPP, which assesses five domains (mobility, participation, self care, psychological well being and relationships), the Western Ontario McMasters University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the General Well-Being Index (GWBI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was posted to people with clinician diagnosed OA. Assessment of the internal construct validity of the PIPP was undertaken using Rasch analysis performed with RUMM2020 software and concurrent validity through comparator measures.
resultsTwo hundred and fifty-nine participants with OA responded. Analysis of the five individual domains of the PIPP indicated that there was good fit to the Rasch model, with high person separation reliability. One item required removal from the Mobility subscale and the Participation subscale. There were strong correlations between the PIPP Mobility scores and the WOMAC disability and pain subscales (rho = .73 and rho = .68), and between the PIPP Psychological well-being and HADS Depression (rho = .71) and GWBI (rho = -.69). High inter-correlations between the impact and distress subscales for each domain (range rho = .85 to .96), suggested redundancy of the latter.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that the PIPP has good psychometric properties in an OA population. The PIPP, using just the impact subscales, provides a brief, reliable and valid means of assessing the impact of OA from the individual's perspective and operationalizing the bio-psychosocial model by the application of a single multi-domain questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.