Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19399643›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell communication and signaling2009

Alternative splicing of CCN mRNAs .... it has been upon us.

Bernard Perbal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell communication and signaling, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. An overview of CCN4 (WISP1) role in human diseases.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of CCN4/WISP-1 in the cancerous phenotype.Cancer management and research · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. CCN1 secretion and cleavage regulate the lung epithelial cell functions after cigarette smoke.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 7th international workshop on the CCN family of genes: Nice to be in nice.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2013
    Article
  19. CCN proteins: A centralized communication network.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernard PerbalR&D L'Oréal, Clark, NJ, USA, bperbal@gmail.com.
L'Oreal (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variant CCN proteins have been identified over the past decade in several normal and pathological situations. The production of CCN truncated proteins have been reported in the case of CCN2(ctgf), CCN3(nov), CCN4(wisp-1) and CCN6(wisp-3). Furthermore, the natural CCN5 is known to miss the C-terminal domain that is present in all other members of the CCN family of proteins. In spite of compelling evidence that assign important biological activities to these truncated CCN variants, their potential regulatory functions have only recently begun to be widely accepted. The report of CCN1(cyr61) intron 3 retention in breast cancer cells now confirms that, in addition to well documented post-translational processing of full length CCN proteins, alternative splicing is to be regarded as another effective way to generate CCN variants. These observations add to a previous bulk of evidence that support the existence of alternative splicing for other CCN genes. It has become clearly evident that we need to recognize these mechanisms as a means to increase the biological diversity of CCN proteins.

Identifiers

PMID19399643
PMCPMC2721083
OpenAlexW1979178328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.