Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19399391›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)2009

[Possibilities of telemedicine in arterial hypertension].

Walter Sehnert, Thomas Mengden

Abstract readControlled Clinical TrialEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Walter SehnertInstitut für klinische Forschung Sehnert, IKFS, Clinical Research Institute, Dortmund. w.sehnert@internist-do.de
Thomas Mengden

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemetric blood pressure measurement opens a new dimension of cooperation between physician and patient. It requires clearly defined therapeutic target values. Telemonitoring is judged positively by 93% of patients treated this way for its exact and long-lasting observation mode by the treating physician. A better control of hypertension is possible due to adaption of therapy over a long observation period and exact blood pressure data by the treating physician and a better adherence to therapy by the patients. Besides good technical and logistic feasibility, published studies show a high acceptance both on the part of patients and treating physicians. Randomized, controlled and prospective studies showed significantly better blood pressure control of telemetrically observed patients compared to standard care. Telemedicine was exceptionally effective when combined with regular individualized interventions like phone calls. These data have to be confirmed by large prospective studies including "hard" endpoints and economic aspects. Of special interest is the telemetric observation in high-risk hypertensive patients like those with coronary artery disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular complications, or hypertension in pregnancy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleFinancing, PersonalGermanyHumansHypertensionHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionTelemetryAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.