ArticleMedizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)2009
[Possibilities of telemedicine in arterial hypertension].
Article in Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemetric blood pressure measurement opens a new dimension of cooperation between physician and patient. It requires clearly defined therapeutic target values. Telemonitoring is judged positively by 93% of patients treated this way for its exact and long-lasting observation mode by the treating physician. A better control of hypertension is possible due to adaption of therapy over a long observation period and exact blood pressure data by the treating physician and a better adherence to therapy by the patients. Besides good technical and logistic feasibility, published studies show a high acceptance both on the part of patients and treating physicians. Randomized, controlled and prospective studies showed significantly better blood pressure control of telemetrically observed patients compared to standard care. Telemedicine was exceptionally effective when combined with regular individualized interventions like phone calls. These data have to be confirmed by large prospective studies including "hard" endpoints and economic aspects. Of special interest is the telemetric observation in high-risk hypertensive patients like those with coronary artery disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular complications, or hypertension in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19399391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.