ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2009
To tube or not to tube babies with respiratory distress syndrome.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adjusting ventilator settings to avoid air trapping in extremely premature infants reduces the need for tracheostomy and length of stay.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Influence of time under mechanical ventilation on bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity in extremely preterm infants: a pilot study.BMC pediatrics · 2020Article
- Impact of the systematic introduction of low-cost bubble nasal CPAP in a NICU of a developing country: a prospective pre- and post-intervention study.BMC pediatrics · 2015Article
- Trends in survival among extremely-low-birth-weight infants (less than 1000 g) without significant bronchopulmonary dysplasia.BMC pediatrics · 2012Article
- Neonatal mortality from respiratory distress syndrome: lessons for low-resource countries.Pediatrics · 2011Article
- Iatrogenic complications in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of mechanical ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and respiratory failure often results in barotrauma, volutrauma and chronic lung disease (CLD). Research indicates that early surfactant therapy and initiation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for these infants significantly reduces the need for mechanical ventilation and the incidence of CLD. Different CPAP delivery systems exist, each with some practical and clinical advantages and disadvantages. Clinical trials indicate that optimal management of neonatal RDS could be improved by early surfactant treatment followed immediately by extubation and stabilization on CPAP. Evidence suggests a synergistic effect between early surfactant administration (within 2 h of birth) and rapid extubation to nasal CPAP with a significant reduction in the need for mechanical ventilation and its associated morbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.