ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2009
Inhaled nitric oxide in the neonate.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Follow-up of neonates who received ECMO: how are they doing?European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- The Role of Echocardiography in Neonates and Pediatric Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Review
- Nitric oxide in paediatric respiratory disorders: novel interventions to address associated vascular phenomena?Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease · 2016Review
- Pathophysiology, management, and outcome of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a clinical review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been used to treat both term and preterm infants with respiratory failure. Term infants with persistent pulmonary hypertension, either as a primary cause or secondary to other disease processes, respond to iNO with improvement in oxygenation indices and a decreased need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia are the exception to this finding, with little clinical benefit observed with iNO treatment. Although respiratory disease in preterm infants has a component of increased pulmonary vascular resistance, little benefit of iNO administration has been observed in premature infants either early in their course or later as a treatment to prevent the evolution of chronic lung disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.