Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19397459›Full record

Trial reportPharmacotherapy2009

Electrocardiographic effects of lofexidine and methadone coadministration: secondary findings from a safety study.

John Schmittner, Jennifer R Schroeder, David H Epstein, Mori J Krantz, Nicole C Eid, Kenzie L Preston

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmacotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Pharmacologic Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: a Review of Pharmacotherapy, Adjuncts, and Toxicity.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Pharmacological strategies for detoxification.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John SchmittnerClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Jennifer R Schroeder
David H Epstein
Mori J Krantz
Nicole C Eid
Kenzie L Preston
Therapeutics Clinical Research · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Evaluation Of Treatments Of Opioid And Cocaine DependenceZIADA000175 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI PRESTON, KENZIE · 2009 to 2016
$7.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveTo determine the electrocardiographic effects of coadministration of lofexidine and methadone.

designProspective, double-blind study.

settingOutpatient drug treatment research clinic.

participantsFourteen adults (mean +/- SD age 34.9 +/- 5.3 yrs) with physical dependence on opioids.

interventionParticipants were stabilized on methadone maintenance therapy, reaching a target dose of 80 mg/day. After 3 weeks of methadone stabilization, participants received lofexidine 0.4 mg or placebo once/day, each for 1 week, administered at the same time as methadone. From weeks 3-8, all subjects received lofexidine, with the dose escalated each week in 0.2-mg increments so that by week 8, participants were receiving lofexidine 1.6 mg/day. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained at baseline (before methadone), after stabilization with methadone, and after lofexidine coadministration during peak plasma lofexidine levels. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPrespecified outcome measures of mean and maximal changes in heart rate, and PR, QRS, and QTc intervals were obtained after stabilization with methadone and after lofexidine 0.4 mg coadministration. Repeated-measures regression showed no significant changes in heart rate or PR, QRS, or QTc interval after methadone stabilization, but a significant decrease in heart rate (mean +/- SD -8.0 +/- 7.3 beats/min, p=0.0006) after starting lofexidine. When data were analyzed by using maximal ECG response, again, no significant changes were noted during methadone induction compared with baseline, but significant changes did occur in all four ECG parameters when lofexidine was coadministered: decreased heart rate (mean +/- SD -9.6 +/- 5.8 beats/min, p<0.0001) and increased PR interval (+11.1 +/- 19.8 msec, p=0.026), QRS interval (+3.7 +/- 4.3 msec, p=0.002), and QTc interval (+21.9 +/- 40.8 msec, p=0.018). In three female participants, the change in QTc interval from baseline was clinically significant (> 40 msec).

conclusionOur preliminary data suggest that coadministration of lofexidine and methadone induces QTc interval prolongation. This drug combination should be prescribed cautiously, with ECG monitoring. Furthermore, because the participants with the largest changes in QTc interval in our study were female, women may be at highest risk.

Indexed as

AdultClonidineDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersPilot ProjectsRisk FactorsSex CharacteristicsClonidinelofexidineMethadoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID19397459
PMCPMC3150470
OpenAlexW1974940240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.