ArticleNeurogenetics2009
A novel 16p locus associated with BSCL2 hereditary motor neuronopathy: a genetic modifier?
Article in Neurogenetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic modifiers and non-Mendelian aspects of CMT.Brain research · 2020Review
- Usefulness of comprehensive targeted multigene panel sequencing for neuromuscular disorders in Korean patients.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019Article
- Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia: Clinical and Genetic Hallmarks.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2017Review
- High incidence of BSCL2 intragenic recombinational mutation in Peruvian type 2 Berardinelli-Seip syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2017Article
- ALS and MMN mimics in patients with BSCL2 mutations: the expanding clinical spectrum of SPG17 hereditary spastic paraplegia.Journal of neurology · 2017Article
- Digenic inheritance in medical genetics.Journal of medical genetics · 2013Review
- Deletion mutation in BSCL2 gene underlies congenital generalized lipodystrophy in a Pakistani family.Diagnostic pathology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe the neurological, electrophysiological, and genetic features of autosomal dominant distal hereditary motor neuronopathy (HMN) in a three-generation Dutch family, including 12 patients with distal muscle weakness and atrophy. The severity of disease ranged from disabling muscle weakness to a subclinical phenotype. Neurologic exams of nine patients and nerve conduction studies (NCS) and myography in five endorsed the variable presentations of HMN in this family, including patients with only lower (four), upper (one), or both upper and lower extremities involvement (four). Asymmetrical or strictly unilateral disease was noted in three patients. Three also showed pyramidal features. A genome-wide search combining SNP arrays (250K) with parametric linkage analysis identified a novel locus on chromosome 16p (mLOD = 3.28) spanning 6 Mb (rs6500882-rs7192086). Direct sequencing excluded mutations in the SIMPLE/LITAF gene (mapping to the 16p locus) and identified a pathogenic mutation (p.N88S) in BCLS2 (11q12-q14). All 12 affected relatives had the BSCL2 mutation and the chromosome 16p haplotype and showed features of motor neuron degeneration. One patient had a very mild phenotype with bilateral pes cavus, normal concentric needle electromyography but signs of motor neuron involvement at electrophysiological muscle scan (EMS). Similar EMS abnormalities in addition to abnormal NCS and myography were observed in a clinically unaffected person (carrying only the 16p haplotype). These results expand the clinical spectrum of HMN and suggest a digenic inheritance of HMN in this family with a BSCL2 mutation and a chromosome 16 locus likely contributing to the phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.