ArticleBiological cybernetics2009
Bilateral matching of frequency tuning in neural cross-correlators of the owl.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ergodicity and parameter estimates in auditory neural circuits.Biological cybernetics · 2018Article
- A Test of the Stereausis Hypothesis for Sound Localization in Mammals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Coupled ears in lizards and crocodilians.Biological cybernetics · 2016Review
- Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.Brain, behavior and evolution · 2015Review
- Article
- A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.Journal of neurophysiology · 2014Article
- Transformation from a pure time delay to a mixed time and phase delay representation in the auditory forebrain pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012Article
- Effect of instantaneous frequency glides on interaural time difference processing by auditory coincidence detectors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
- Neural development of binaural tuning through Hebbian learning predicts frequency-dependent best delays.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011Article
- A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sound localization requires comparison between the inputs to the left and right ears. One important aspect of this comparison is the differences in arrival time to each side, also called interaural time difference (ITD). A prevalent model of ITD detection, consisting of delay lines and coincidence-detector neurons, was proposed by Jeffress (J Comp Physiol Psychol 41:35-39, 1948). As an extension of the Jeffress model, the process of detecting and encoding ITD has been compared to an effective cross-correlation between the input signals to the two ears. Because the cochlea performs a spectrotemporal decomposition of the input signal, this cross-correlation takes place over narrow frequency bands. Since the cochlear tonotopy is arranged in series, sounds of different frequencies will trigger neural activity with different temporal delays. Thus, the matching of the frequency tuning of the left and right inputs to the cross-correlator units becomes a 'timing' issue. These properties of auditory transduction gave theoretical support to an alternative model of ITD-detection based on a bilateral mismatch in frequency tuning, called the 'stereausis' model. Here we first review the current literature on the owl's nucleus laminaris, the equivalent to the medial superior olive of mammals, which is the site where ITD is detected. Subsequently, we use reverse correlation analysis and stimulation with uncorrelated sounds to extract the effective monaural inputs to the cross-correlator neurons. We show that when the left and right inputs to the cross-correlators are defined in this manner, the computation performed by coincidence-detector neurons satisfies conditions of cross-correlation theory. We also show that the spectra of left and right inputs are matched, which is consistent with predictions made by the classic model put forth by Jeffress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.