ReviewDer Internist2009
[Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Indications, foundations and perspective].
Review in Der Internist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brazilian Nutritional Consensus in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Adults.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2020Article
- Personalizing Stem Cell Research and Therapy: The Arduous Road Ahead or Missed Opportunity?Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2010Article
- [Myelodysplastic syndromes].Der Internist · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become a standard therapy for many inherited and acquired disorders of the bone marrow and immune system. Autologous HSCT is mainly done as part of the primary therapy in multiple myeloma and as part of relapse therapy in malignant lymphoma. In contrast, allogeneic HSCT is predominantly performed in patients with acute leukemias. The selection process for allogeneic HSCT takes disease-specific as well as patient-specific factors into account. Risk factors which can predict for poor response to chemotherapy can now be identified in acute myeloid as well as lymphoid leukemia, based on phenotype, cytogenetics, molecular genetics and response to therapy. In these patients allogeneic HSCT can improve overall survival from 0-20% to 30-60%. New conditioning protocols have now raised the upper age limit for transplantation to 70 years. In elderly patients the selection of patients based on absence of comorbidities becomes especially important. The increasing number of long-term survivors requires knowledge of organ-specific late toxicities including secondary malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.