Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19394310›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2009

Prediction of functionally important sites from protein sequences using sparse kernel least squares classifiers.

Ke Tang, Ganesan Pugalenthi, P N Suganthan, Christopher J Lanczycki, Saikat Chakrabarti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ke TangNICAL, Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ganesan Pugalenthi
P N Suganthan
Christopher J Lanczycki
Saikat Chakrabarti

Funding

Structural Biology Information ResourcesZIALM000046 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI BRYANT, STEPHEN H · 2009 to 2017
$45.4M
Structural Biology Information ResourcesZ01LM000046 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI BRYANT, STEPHEN H. · 1993 to 2008
$10.4M
Intramural NIH HHS NIH0011844701Intramural NIH HHS Z01 LM000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of functionally important sites (FIS) in proteins is a critical problem and can have profound importance where protein structural information is limited. Machine learning techniques have been very useful in successful classification of many important biological problems. In this paper, we adopt the sparse kernel least squares classifiers (SKLSC) approach for classification and/or prediction of FIS using protein sequence derived features. The SKLSC algorithm was applied to 5435 FIS that have been extracted from 312 reliable alignments for a wide range of protein families. We obtained 68.28% sensitivity and 68.66% specificity for training dataset and 65.34% sensitivity and 66.88% specificity for testing dataset. Further, large scale benchmarking study using alignments of 101 protein families containing 1899 FIS showed that our method achieved an average approximately 70% sensitivity in predicting different types of FIS, such as active sites, metal, ligand or protein binding sites. Our findings also indicate that active sites and metal binding sites are comparably easier to predict compared to the ligand and protein binding sites. Despite moderate success, our results suggest the usefulness and potential of SKLSC approach in prediction of FIS using only protein sequence derived information.

Indexed as

Binding SitesAmino Acid SequenceCatalytic DomainLeast-Squares AnalysisProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID19394310
PMCPMC2750782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.