Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19393065›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2009

Cross-species mapping of bidirectional promoters enables prediction of unannotated 5' UTRs and identification of species-specific transcripts.

Helen Piontkivska, Mary Q Yang, Denis M Larkin, Harris A Lewin, James Reecy, Laura Elnitski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genetic variability of the activity of bidirectional promoters: a pilot study in bovine muscle.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helen Piontkivska2Department of BiologicalSciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA. opiontki@kent.edu
Mary Q Yang
Denis M Larkin
Harris A Lewin
James Reecy
Laura Elnitski
National Human Genome Research Institute · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USIowa State University · USKent State University · US

Funding

Regulatory and epigenetic landscapes reveal biological processes, disease mechanisms and diagnostic markersZIAHG200323 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ELNITSKI, LAURA L · 2009 to 2025
$27.6M
Genomic-Functional Analyses-Conserved Noncoding RegionsZ01HG200323 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ELNITSKI, LAURA L · 2005 to 2008
$2.3M
Intramural NIH HHSWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBidirectional promoters are shared regulatory regions that influence the expression of two oppositely oriented genes. This type of regulatory architecture is found more frequently than expected by chance in the human genome, yet many specifics underlying the regulatory design are unknown. Given that the function of most orthologous genes is similar across species, we hypothesized that the architecture and regulation of bidirectional promoters might also be similar across species, representing a core regulatory structure and enabling annotation of these regions in additional mammalian genomes.

resultsBy mapping the intergenic distances of genes in human, chimpanzee, bovine, murine, and rat, we show an enrichment for pairs of genes equal to or less than 1,000 bp between their adjacent 5' ends ("head-to-head") compared to pairs of genes that fall in the same orientation ("head-to-tail") or whose 3' ends are side-by-side ("tail-to-tail"). A representative set of 1,369 human bidirectional promoters was mapped to orthologous sequences in other mammals. We confirmed predictions for 5' UTRs in nine of ten manual picks in bovine based on comparison to the orthologous human promoter set and in six of seven predictions in human based on comparison to the bovine dataset. The two predictions that did not have orthology as bidirectional promoters in the other species resulted from unique events that initiated transcription in the opposite direction in only those species. We found evidence supporting the independent emergence of bidirectional promoters from the family of five RecQ helicase genes, which gained their bidirectional promoters and partner genes independently rather than through a duplication process. Furthermore, by expanding our comparisons from pairwise to multispecies analyses we developed a map representing a core set of bidirectional promoters in mammals.

conclusionWe show that the orthologous positions of bidirectional promoters provide a reliable guide to directly annotate over one thousand regulatory regions in sequences of mammalian genomes, while also serving as a useful tool to predict 5' UTR positions and identify genes that are novel to a single species.

Indexed as

Chromosome Mapping5' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsCattleConserved SequenceHumansPhylogenyPromoter Regions, GeneticRecQ HelicasesSequence Analysis, DNASpecies Specificity5' Untranslated RegionsRecQ Helicases

Identifiers

PMID19393065
PMCPMC2688522
OpenAlexW1994167821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.