Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19393017›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurochemistry2009

Differential gene expression in LPS/IFNgamma activated microglia and macrophages: in vitro versus in vivo.

Christoph D Schmid, Benoit Melchior, Kokoechat Masek, Shweta S Puntambekar, Patria E Danielson, David D Lo, J Gregor Sutcliffe, Monica J Carson

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurochemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Microglia in Neurodegenerative Events-An Initiator or a Significant Other?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christoph D SchmidSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Epalinges s/Lausanne, Switzerland.
Benoit Melchior
Kokoechat Masek
Shweta S Puntambekar
Patria E Danielson
David D Lo
J Gregor Sutcliffe
Monica J Carson
University of California, Riverside · USScripps Research Institute · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

MOLECULES OF ACTIVATED MICROGLIAR01NS039508 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI CARSON, MONICA J · 2000 to 2004
$1.4M
Triggering Receptors and CNS InflammationR01NS045735 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI CARSON, MONICA J · 2003 to 2006
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS NS045735NINDS NIH HHS NS39508NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039508NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two different macrophage populations contribute to CNS neuroinflammation: CNS-resident microglia and CNS-infiltrating peripheral macrophages. Markers distinguishing these two populations in tissue sections have not been identified. Therefore, we compared gene expression between LPS (lipopolysaccharide)/interferon (IFN)gamma-treated microglia from neonatal mixed glial cultures and similarly treated peritoneal macrophages. Fifteen molecules were identified by quantative PCR (qPCR) as being enriched from 2-fold to 250-fold in cultured neonatal microglia when compared with peritoneal macrophages. Only three of these molecules (C1qA, Trem2, and CXCL14) were found by qPCR to be also enriched in adult microglia isolated from LPS/IFNgamma-injected CNS when compared with infiltrating peripheral macrophages from the same CNS. The discrepancy between the in vitro and in vivo qPCR data sets was primarily because of induced expression of the 'microglial' molecules (such as the tolerance associated transcript, Tmem176b) in CNS-infiltrating macrophages. Bioinformatic analysis of the approximately 19000 mRNAs detected by TOGA gene profiling confirmed that LPS/IFNgamma-activated microglia isolated from adult CNS displayed greater similarity in total gene expression to CNS-infiltrating macrophages than to microglia isolated from unmanipulated healthy adult CNS. In situ hybridization analysis revealed that nearly all microglia expressed high levels of C1qA, while subsets of microglia expressed Trem2 and CXCL14. Expression of C1qA and Trem2 was limited to microglia, while large numbers of GABA+ neurons expressed CXCL14. These data suggest that (i) CNS-resident microglia are heterogeneous and thus a universal microglia-specific marker may not exist; (ii) the CNS micro-environment plays significant roles in determining the phenotypes of both CNS-resident microglia and CNS-infiltrating macrophages; (iii) the CNS microenvironment may contribute to immune privilege by inducing macrophage expression of anti-inflammatory molecules.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, NorthernCells, CulturedComputational BiologyDendritic CellsGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingIn Situ HybridizationInterferon-gammaLipopolysaccharidesMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrogliaModels, NeurologicalInterferon-gammaLipopolysaccharidesRNA

Identifiers

PMID19393017
PMCPMC2766614
OpenAlexW2028090656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.