Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19392833›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2009

Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research.

Jill Thompson, Rosemary Barber, Paul R Ward, Jonathan D Boote, Cindy L Cooper, Christopher J Armitage, Georgina Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Black and minority ethnic group involvement in health and social care research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jill ThompsonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. jill.thompson@sheffield.ac.uk
Rosemary Barber
Paul R Ward
Jonathan D Boote
Cindy L Cooper
Christopher J Armitage
Georgina Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate health researchers' attitudes to involving the public in research.

backgroundPublic involvement in research is encouraged by the Department of Health in the UK. Despite this, the number of health researchers actively involving the public in research appears to be limited. There is little research specifically addressing the attitudes of health researchers towards involving the public: how they interpret the policy, what motivates and de-motivates them and what their experiences have been to date.

designA qualitative research design, using semi-structured telephone interviews. SETTING AND

participantsFifteen purposively sampled UK-based University health researchers were the participants. Interviews were conducted over the telephone.

findingsThe participants suggested varying constructions of public involvement in research. Arguments based on moral and political principles and consequentialist arguments for involving the public in research were offered and most participants highlighted the potential benefits of involving the public. However, feelings of apprehension expressed by some participants imply that a number of researchers may still be uncomfortable with involving the public, as it presents a different way of working.

Indexed as

AttitudeCommunity ParticipationHealth Services ResearchFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleResearch PersonnelUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID19392833
PMCPMC5060486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.