Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19391622›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2009

Prediction of the rotational tumbling time for proteins with disordered segments.

Sung-Hun Bae, H Jane Dyson, Peter E Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sung-Hun BaeDepartment of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
H Jane Dyson
Peter E Wright

Funding

UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITORS OF PRION REPLICATIONP01AG021601 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PRUSINER, STANLEY B · 2003 to 2013
$31.9M
Structural basis for CBP/p300 transcriptional regulationR01CA096865 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WRIGHT, PETER EDWIN · 2002 to 2016
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA96865NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096865NIA NIH HHS AG21601NIA NIH HHS P01 AG021601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For well-structured, rigid proteins, the prediction of rotational tumbling time (tau(c)) using atomic coordinates is reasonably accurate, but is inaccurate for proteins with long unstructured sequences. Under physiological conditions, many proteins contain long disordered segments that play important regulatory roles in fundamental biological events including signal transduction and molecular recognition. Here we describe an ensemble approach to the boundary element method that accurately predicts tau(c) for such proteins by introducing two layers of molecular surfaces whose correlated velocities decay exponentially with distance. Reliable prediction of tau(c) will help to detect intra- and intermolecular interactions and conformational switches between more ordered and less ordered states of the disordered segments. The method has been extensively validated using 12 reference proteins with 14 to 103 disordered residues at the N- and/or C-terminus and has been successfully employed to explain a set of published results on a system that incorporates a conformational switch.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingCalmodulinProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryTime FactorsCalmodulinProteins

Identifiers

PMID19391622
PMCPMC2694746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.