Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19390837›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2009

[Management of complications after sling and mesh implantations].

C Hampel, G Naumann, J W Thüroff, R Gillitzer

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Imaging of slings and meshes.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2014
    Review
  8. [Stress incontinence in elderly women].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Update on complications of synthetic suburethral slings.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C HampelUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz. hampel@urologie.klinik.uni-mainz.de
G Naumann
J W Thüroff
R Gillitzer
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tension-free alloplastic slings (TFAS) have revolutionized surgery for female stress urinary incontinence for more than 15 years. The procedure is easy to perform, minimally invasive with short operation time in an ambulatory setting, and has proven efficacy comparable to the gold standard procedure of retropubic colposuspension.Possible TFAS complications are potentially underestimated with respect to prevalence and manageability. We report our experience with major complications following TFAS and mesh implantation in patients referred to our interdisciplinary continence center. Patient history, risk factors, and preoperative diagnostics were analyzed for development of individualized treatment strategies. Overcorrections with formation of postvoid residual (PVR) can occur in retropubic TFAS as well as in transobturator TFAS. However, the most prevalent and challenging complication is de novo urgency. Major complications like urethrovaginal fistula, sling arrosions of the urethra, bladder, and vagina as well as infected gangrene and complete urethral loss requiring urinary diversion were seen at a frequency suggesting underrepresentation of these complications in the literature. The large amount of implanted artificial mesh material used for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) correction represents a particular challenge in cases of dyspareunia or persisting pelvic pain.Complication management has to be based on cystoscopic, urodynamic, and physical examination findings to be individualized to each patient and must take potential risks of recurrent incontinence or persisting complaints into account.To prevent TFAS or mesh complications, every patient should have tried all conservative treatment options and should be completely evaluated (including urodynamics) preoperatively. Artificial meshes should only be used in cases of prolapse recurrence or in otherwise inoperable patients. Postoperative urodynamics may help to document treatment success and to identify and quantify complications.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceReoperationSuburethral SlingsSurgical MeshUrinary Incontinence, StressUrodynamicsBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID19390837
OpenAlexW1851759410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.