Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19390585›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2009

Phase 1/2a study of the malaria vaccine candidate apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) administered in adjuvant system AS01B or AS02A.

Michele D Spring, James F Cummings, Christian F Ockenhouse, Sheetij Dutta, Randall Reidler, Evelina Angov, Elke Bergmann-Leitner, V Ann Stewart, Stacey Bittner, Laure Juompan and 23 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00385047 (Phase I/IIa Study of the Safety, Immunogenicity and Preliminary Efficacy After Sporozoite Challenge of FMP2.1/AS01B and FMP2.1/AS02A Candidate Malaria Vaccines Administered Intramuscularly at Months 0, 1, and 2 in Malaria-naive Adults Living in the United States), which is not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00385047 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Phase I/IIa Study of the Safety, Immunogenicity and Preliminary Efficacy After Sporozoite Challenge of FMP2.1/AS01B and FMP2.1/AS02A Candidate Malaria Vaccines Administered Intramuscularly at Months 0, 1, and 2 in Malaria-naive Adults Living in the United States

TypeinterventionalSponsorU.S. Army Medical Research and Development CommandRan2006 to 2007Enrolled41ConditionsMalariaArmsGroup A FMP2.1/AS01B, Group B FMP2.1/AS02A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. A field trial to assess a blood-stage malaria vaccine.The New England journal of medicine · 2011
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Michele D SpringUnited States Military Malaria Vaccine Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America. michele.spring@us.army.mil
James F Cummings
Christian F Ockenhouse
Sheetij Dutta
Randall Reidler
Evelina Angov
Elke Bergmann-Leitner
V Ann Stewart
Stacey Bittner
Laure Juompan
Mark G Kortepeter
Robin Nielsen
Urszula Krzych
Ev Tierney
Lisa A Ware
Megan Dowler
Cornelus C Hermsen
Robert W Sauerwein
Sake J de Vlas
Opokua Ofori-Anyinam
David E Lanar
Jack L Williams
Kent E Kester
Kathryn Tucker
Meng Shi
Elissa Malkin
Carole Long
Carter L Diggs
Lorraine Soisson
Marie-Claude Dubois
W Ripley Ballou
Joe Cohen
D Gray Heppner
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · USGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUnited States Agency for International Development · USErasmus MC · NLNational Institutes of Health · USStatistics Collaborative · US

Funding

Host Immune Responses to Antigens of Malaria ParasitesZIAAI001020 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI LONG, CAROLE · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Host Immune Responses to Antigens of Malaria ParasitesZ01AI001020 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI LONG, CAROLE · 2007 to 2008
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis Phase 1/2a study evaluated the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of an experimental malaria vaccine comprised of the recombinant Plasmodium falciparum protein apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) representing the 3D7 allele formulated with either the AS01B or AS02A Adjuvant Systems. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsAfter a preliminary safety evaluation of low dose AMA-1/AS01B (10 microg/0.5 mL) in 5 adults, 30 malaria-naïve adults were randomly allocated to receive full dose (50 microg/0.5 mL) of AMA-1/AS01B (n = 15) or AMA-1/AS02A (n = 15), followed by a malaria challenge. All vaccinations were administered intramuscularly on a 0-, 1-, 2-month schedule. All volunteers experienced transient injection site erythema, swelling and pain. Two weeks post-third vaccination, anti-AMA-1 Geometric Mean Antibody Concentrations (GMCs) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were high: low dose AMA-1/AS01B 196 microg/mL (103-371 microg/mL), full dose AMA-1/AS01B 279 microg/mL (210-369 microg/mL) and full dose AMA-1/AS02A 216 microg/mL (169-276 microg/mL) with no significant difference among the 3 groups. The three vaccine formulations elicited equivalent functional antibody responses, as measured by growth inhibition assay (GIA), against homologous but not against heterologous (FVO) parasites as well as demonstrable interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) responses. To assess efficacy, volunteers were challenged with P. falciparum-infected mosquitoes, and all became parasitemic, with no significant difference in the prepatent period by either light microscopy or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). However, a small but significant reduction of parasitemia in the AMA-1/AS02A group was seen with a statistical model employing qPCR measurements. SIGNIFICANCE: All three vaccine formulations were found to be safe and highly immunogenic. These immune responses did not translate into significant vaccine efficacy in malaria-naïve adults employing a primary sporozoite challenge model, but encouragingly, estimation of parasite growth rates from qPCR data may suggest a partial biological effect of the vaccine. Further evaluation of the immunogenicity and efficacy of the AMA-1/AS02A formulation is ongoing in a malaria-experienced pediatric population in Mali.

trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00385047.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultAllelesAnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLipid AMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedPlasmodium falciparumAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, Protozoanapical membrane antigen I, PlasmodiumASO2A adjuvantDrug CombinationsLipid AMalaria VaccinesMembrane ProteinsProtozoan ProteinsSaponins

Identifiers

PMID19390585
PMCPMC2669163
OpenAlexW2098671941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.