ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Recognizing obesity and comorbidities in sparse data.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
131 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep representation learning of patient data from Electronic Health Records (EHR): A systematic review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Pooled it
- Natural language processing of symptoms documented in free-text narratives of electronic health records: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Evaluating the state of the art in coreference resolution for electronic medical records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAPooled it
- A study of large language models for patient information extraction: Model architecture, fine-tuning strategy, and multi-task instruction tuning.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Article
- Information extraction from clinical notes: are we ready to switch to large language models?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Keyword-optimized template insertion for clinical note classification via prompt-based learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of machine learning models and human expertise for nursing intervention classification.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Question Answering for Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review of Datasets and Models.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Knowledge graph construction for heart failure using large language models with prompt engineering.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Secondary Use of Clinical Problem List Descriptions for Bi-Encoder Based ICD-10 Classification.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Review
- Impact of possible errors in natural language processing-derived data on downstream epidemiologic analysis.JAMIA open · 2023Article
- Heart disease risk factors detection from electronic health records using advanced NLP and deep learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Automated Detection of Substance-Use Status and Related Information from Clinical Text.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A scoping review of publicly available language tasks in clinical natural language processing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- A comparative study on deep learning models for text classification of unstructured medical notes with various levels of class imbalance.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- SemClinBr - a multi-institutional and multi-specialty semantically annotated corpus for Portuguese clinical NLP tasks.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2022Article
- When BERT meets Bilbo: a learning curve analysis of pretrained language model on disease classification.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- A Review of Recent Work in Transfer Learning and Domain Adaptation for Natural Language Processing of Electronic Health Records.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2021Review
- A comprehensive study of mobility functioning information in clinical notes: Entity hierarchy, corpus annotation, and sequence labeling.International journal of medical informatics · 2021Article
71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In order to survey, facilitate, and evaluate studies of medical language processing on clinical narratives, i2b2 (Informatics for Integrating Biology to the Bedside) organized its second challenge and workshop. This challenge focused on automatically extracting information on obesity and fifteen of its most common comorbidities from patient discharge summaries. For each patient, obesity and any of the comorbidities could be Present, Absent, or Questionable (i.e., possible) in the patient, or Unmentioned in the discharge summary of the patient. i2b2 provided data for, and invited the development of, automated systems that can classify obesity and its comorbidities into these four classes based on individual discharge summaries. This article refers to obesity and comorbidities as diseases. It refers to the categories Present, Absent, Questionable, and Unmentioned as classes. The task of classifying obesity and its comorbidities is called the Obesity Challenge. The data released by i2b2 was annotated for textual judgments reflecting the explicitly reported information on diseases, and intuitive judgments reflecting medical professionals' reading of the information presented in discharge summaries. There were very few examples of some disease classes in the data. The Obesity Challenge paid particular attention to the performance of systems on these less well-represented classes. A total of 30 teams participated in the Obesity Challenge. Each team was allowed to submit two sets of up to three system runs for evaluation, resulting in a total of 136 submissions. The submissions represented a combination of rule-based and machine learning approaches. Evaluation of system runs shows that the best predictions of textual judgments come from systems that filter the potentially noisy portions of the narratives, project dictionaries of disease names onto the remaining text, apply negation extraction, and process the text through rules. Information on disease-related concepts, such as symptoms and medications, and general medical knowledge help systems infer intuitive judgments on the diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.