Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19388855›Full record

ArticleJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2009

Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q).

Sara A Quandt, Marja J Verhoef, Thomas A Arcury, George T Lewith, Aslak Steinsbekk, Agnete E Kristoffersen, Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler, Vinjar Fønnebø

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara A QuandtDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063, USA. squandt@wfubmc.edu
Marja J Verhoef
Thomas A Arcury
George T Lewith
Aslak Steinsbekk
Agnete E Kristoffersen
Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler
Vinjar Fønnebø

Funding

Ethnic Variation in CAM Use and Health Self Management among Rural Older AdultsR01AT003635 · NCCIH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARCURY, THOMAS A. · 2006 to 2009
$1.7M
Differences in CAM Use Among Minority Older AdultsR21AT002241 · NCCIH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARCURY, THOMAS A · 2004 to 2005
$395k
NCCIH NIH HHS AT002241NCCIH NIH HHS AT003635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExisting studies on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) have produced diverse results regarding the types and prevalence of CAM use due, in part, to variations in the measurement of CAM modalities. A questionnaire that can be adapted for use in a variety of populations will improve CAM utilization measurement. The purposes of this article are to (1) articulate the need for such a common questionnaire; (2) describe the process of questionnaire development; (3) present a model questionnaire with core questions; and (4) suggest standard techniques for adapting the questionnaire to different languages and populations.

methodsAn international workshop sponsored by the National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) of the University of Tromsø, Norway, brought CAM researchers and practitioners together to design an international CAM questionnaire (I-CAM-Q). Existing questionnaires were critiqued, and working groups drafted content for a new questionnaire. A smaller working group completed, tested, and revised this self-administered questionnaire.

resultsThe questionnaire that was developed contains four sections concerned with visits to health care providers, complementary treatments received from physicians, use of herbal medicine and dietary supplements, and self-help practices. A priori-specified practitioners, therapies, supplements, and practices are included, as well as places for researcher-specified and respondent-specified additions. Core questions are designed to elicit frequency of use, purpose (treatment of acute or chronic conditions, and health maintenance), and satisfaction. A penultimate version underwent pretesting with "think-aloud" techniques to identify problems related to meaning and format. The final questionnaire is presented, with suggestions for testing and translating.

conclusionsOnce validated in English and non-English speaking populations, the I-CAM-Q will provide an opportunity for researchers to gather comparable data in studies conducted in different populations. Such data will increase knowledge about the epidemiology of CAM use and provide the foundation for evidence-based comparisons at an international level.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysSurveys and QuestionnairesComplementary TherapiesDietary SupplementsHealth PersonnelHerbal MedicineHumansInternationalityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionResearch DesignSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID19388855
PMCPMC3189003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.