Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19387598›Full record

ArticleHNO2009

[Use of the internet for health information by ENT patients].

A Gurr, M Schwaab, S Hansen, V Noack, S Dazert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Thematic coverage and readability of online patient information on cochlear implant care.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A GurrUniversitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, und Ohrenheilkunde der Ruhr-Universität Bochum im St. Elisabeth Hospital, Bleichstrasse 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland. andre.gurr@rub.de
M Schwaab
S Hansen
V Noack
S Dazert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe internet is becoming increasingly more important as a source of information for patients, so that nowadays internet-based information must be more frequently considered in the dialogue with patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study is based on an analysis of ENT patients' habits in acquiring information from the internet. The data were collected by a questionnaire for in-patients over a period of 9 months during 2006 and 2007. A total of 503 patients with different family backgrounds were interviewed and the answers analyzed with respect to the illness, age, gender, education and information acquisition from the internet.

resultsThe younger generation was found to use the internet in general more than older patients and there were no differences between males and females. Middle aged patients in particular used the internet for answering questions on health. Patients with complex elective surgery used the internet more often than patients undergoing simple elective surgery and patients with tumors and private patients used the internet more often than those with social health insurance. Among the questioned patients it was noticeable that a high proportion of those using internet to obtain information were well educated. DISCUSSION: Despite the high quality of information available for ENT patients on the internet, information obtained from the treating physician is still preferred by many patients. Due to demographic changes an increased use of the internet for patient information is to be expected in the future. The correlation found in this study between education, insurance status and the use of the internet might play a role in a target group oriented improvement of information supply.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesConsumer Health InformationGermanyInternetOtolaryngologyPatient Education as TopicPatients

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.