Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19386106›Full record

SynthesisBMC complementary and alternative medicine2009

How parents choose to use CAM: a systematic review of theoretical models.

Ava Lorenc, Yael Ilan-Clarke, Nicola Robinson, Mitch Blair

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Acupuncture versus medication for pain management: a cross-sectional study of breast cancer survivors.Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society · 2018
    Article
  7. Understanding CAM Use in Lebanon: Findings from a National Survey.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A sociobehavioral wellness model of acupuncture use in the United States, 2007.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integrative medicine - traditional Chinese medicine, a model ?Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ava LorencCentre for Complementary Healthcare and Integrated Medicine, Thames Valley University, Brentford, Middlesex, UK. ava.lorenc@tvu.ac.uk
Yael Ilan-Clarke
Nicola Robinson
Mitch Blair

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is widely used throughout the UK and the Western world. CAM is commonly used for children and the decision-making process to use CAM is affected by numerous factors. Most research on CAM use lacks a theoretical framework and is largely based on bivariate statistics. The aim of this review was to identify a conceptual model which could be used to explain the decision-making process in parental choice of CAM.

methodsA systematic search of the literature was carried out. A two-stage selection process with predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria identified studies using a theoretical framework depicting the interaction of psychological factors involved in the CAM decision process. Papers were critically appraised and findings summarised.

resultsTwenty two studies using a theoretical model to predict CAM use were included in the final review; only one examined child use. Seven different models were identified. The most commonly used and successful model was Andersen's Sociobehavioural Model (SBM). Two papers proposed modifications to the SBM for CAM use. Six qualitative studies developed their own model.

conclusionThe SBM modified for CAM use, which incorporates both psychological and pragmatic determinants, was identified as the best conceptual model of CAM use. This model provides a valuable framework for future research, and could be used to explain child CAM use. An understanding of the decision making process is crucial in promoting shared decision making between healthcare practitioners and parents and could inform service delivery, guidance and policy.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorModels, PsychologicalAdultChildComplementary TherapiesDecision MakingHumansParents

Identifiers

PMID19386106
PMCPMC2680396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.