Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19384595›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2009

Fifteen-year experience in treating blepharospasm with Botox or Dysport: same toxin, two drugs.

A R Bentivoglio, A Fasano, T Ialongo, F Soleti, S Lo Fermo, A Albanese

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Use of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of the Dystonias.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Botulinum neurotoxin formulations: overcoming the confusion.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Use of Botulinum Neurotoxin in Ophthalmology.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Blepharospasm: long-term treatment with either Botox®, Xeomin® or Dysport®.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A R BentivoglioIstituto di Neurologia Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8 - 00168 Rome, Italy. annarita.bentivoglio@rm.unicatt.it
A Fasano
T Ialongo
F Soleti
S Lo Fermo
A Albanese
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITInstitute of Neurological Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the clinical characteristics and the long-term outcome of a large series of patients with blepharospasm (BS) treated with the two most used brands of BoNT-A over the last 15 years.

methodsWe have reviewed the clinical charts of 128 patients with BS who received botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) in 1341 treatments (Botox in 1009, Dysport in 332) over the last 15 years.

resultsMean dose per session was 34U +/- 15 for Botox and 152U +/- 54 for Dysport. Mean latency of clinical effect was 4.5 +/- 4.6 days for Botox and 5.0 +/- 5.7 days for Dysport (P > 0.05). Mean duration of clinical improvement was higher for Dysport than Botox: 80.1 +/- 36.3 and 66.2 +/- 39.8 days, respectively (P < 0.01). In a six-point scale (0: no efficacy, 6: remission of BS), the mean efficacy of both treatments was 3.60 +/- 1.3; 3.51 +/- 1.4 (Botox) and 3.85 +/- 1.2 (Dysport), P < 0.01. The doses of Botox (beta = 0.40) and Dysport (beta = 0.16) were significantly increased over time. Side effects occurred in 325 out of 1341 treatments (24.2%): 21.8% of the patients who had received Botox, and in 31.6% of those who had received Dysport (P < 0.01).

conclusionsBoth brands are effective and safe in treating blepharospasm; efficacy is long lasting. The differences in outcome and side effects suggest that, albeit the active drug is the same, Botox and Dysport should be considered as two different drugs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceBlepharospasmBotulinum Toxins, Type AChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular AgentsRetrospective StudiesStatistics as TopicBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

PMID19384595
OpenAlexW2138782429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.