ArticlePloS one2009
Rpb1 sumoylation in response to UV radiation or transcriptional impairment in yeast.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic sumoylation is essential in yeast for suppressing stress-induced gene expression in non-stress conditions.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Dynamic sumoylation of promoter-bound general transcription factors facilitates transcription by RNA polymerase II.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- A SUMO-dependent pathway controls elongating RNA Polymerase II upon UV-induced damage.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- An E2-ubiquitin thioester-driven approach to identify substrates modified with ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like molecules.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Identification of cell-specific targets of sumoylation during mouse spermatogenesis.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2016Article
- Sumoylation of Rap1 mediates the recruitment of TFIID to promote transcription of ribosomal protein genes.Genome research · 2015Article
- SUMO-mediated regulation of DNA damage repair and responses.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2015Review
- Aberrant sumoylation signaling evoked by reactive oxygen species impairs protective function of Prdx6 by destabilization and repression of its transcription.The FEBS journal · 2014Article
- Sumoylation of the Rad1 nuclease promotes DNA repair and regulates its DNA association.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Multiple crosstalks between mRNA biogenesis and SUMO.Chromosoma · 2013Article
- Sumoylation and the DNA damage response.Biomolecules · 2012Review
- A role for SUMO in nucleotide excision repair.DNA repair · 2011Article
- Cdc48/p97 mediates UV-dependent turnover of RNA Pol II.Molecular cell · 2011Article
- SUMO functions in constitutive transcription and during activation of inducible genes in yeast.Genes & development · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Covalent modifications of proteins by ubiquitin and the Small Ubiquitin-like MOdifier (SUMO) have been revealed to be involved in a plethora of cellular processes, including transcription, DNA repair and DNA damage responses. It has been well known that in response to DNA damage that blocks transcription elongation, Rpb1, the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II), is ubiquitylated and subsequently degraded in mammalian and yeast cells. However, it is still an enigma regarding how Pol II responds to damaged DNA and conveys signal(s) for DNA damage-related cellular processes. We found that Rpb1 is also sumoylated in yeast cells upon UV radiation or impairment of transcription elongation, and this modification is independent of DNA damage checkpoint activation. Ubc9, an E2 SUMO conjugase, and Siz1, an E3 SUMO ligase, play important roles in Rpb1 sumoylation. K1487, which is located in the acidic linker region between the C-terminal domain and the globular domain of Rpb1, is the major sumoylation site. Rpb1 sumoylation is not affected by its ubiquitylation, and vice versa, indicating that the two processes do not crosstalk. Abolishment of Rpb1 sumoylation at K1487 does not affect transcription elongation or transcription coupled repair (TCR) of UV-induced DNA damage. However, deficiency in TCR enhances UV-induced Rpb1 sumoylation, presumably due to the persistence of transcription-blocking DNA lesions in the transcribed strand of a gene. Remarkably, abolishment of Rpb1 sumoylation at K1487 causes enhanced and prolonged UV-induced phosphorylation of Rad53, especially in TCR-deficient cells, suggesting that the sumoylation plays a role in restraining the DNA damage checkpoint response caused by transcription-blocking lesions. Our results demonstrate a novel covalent modification of Rpb1 in response to UV induced DNA damage or transcriptional impairment, and unravel an important link between the modification and the DNA damage checkpoint response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.