Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19383904›Full record

ArticleCancer research2009

Development of a multiplex quantitative PCR signature to predict progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Rou Wang, David S Morris, Scott A Tomlins, Robert J Lonigro, Alexander Tsodikov, Rohit Mehra, Thomas J Giordano, L Priya Kunju, Cheryl T Lee, Alon Z Weizer and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Integrative analysis of 1q23.3 copy-number gain in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rou WangDepartment of Urology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0944, USA.
David S Morris
Scott A Tomlins
Robert J Lonigro
Alexander Tsodikov
Rohit Mehra
Thomas J Giordano
L Priya Kunju
Cheryl T Lee
Alon Z Weizer
Arul M Chinnaiyan
Michigan Center for Translational Pathology · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USDiabetes Australia · AUHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Epitomic Biomarkers of Prostate CancerU01CA111275 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHINNAIYAN, ARUL M, RUBIN, MARK A. · 2004 to 2015
$6.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS U01 CA111275NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA111275-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bladder cancer, clinical grade and stage fail to capture outcome. We developed a clinically applicable quantitative PCR (QPCR) gene signature to predict progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Comparative metaprofiling of 12 DNA microarray data sets (comprising 631 samples and 241,298 probe sets) identified 96 genes, which showed differential expression in seven clinical outcome categories, or were identified as outliers, historic markers, or housekeeping genes. QPCR was done to determine mRNA expression from 96 bladder tumors. Fifty-seven genes differentiated T2 from non-T2 tumors (P < 0.05). Principal components analysis and Cox regression models were used to predict probability of T2 progression for non-T2 patients, placing them into high- and low-risk groups based on their gene expression. At 2 years, high-risk patients exhibited greater T2 progression (45% for high-risk patients versus 12% for low-risk patients; P = 0.003, log-rank test). This difference remained significant within T1 tumors (61% for high-risk patients versus 22% for low-risk patients; P = 0.02) and Ta tumors (29% for high-risk patients versus 0% for low-risk patients; P = 0.03). The best multivariate Cox model included stage and gender, and this signature provided predictive improvement over both (P = 0.002, likelihood ratio test). Immunohistochemistry was done for two genes in the signature not previously described in bladder cancer, ACTN1 and CDC25B, corroborating their up-regulation at the protein level with disease progression. Thus, we identified a 57-gene QPCR panel to help predict progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers and delineate a systematic, generalizable approach to converting microarray data into a multiplex assay for cancer progression.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19383904
PMCPMC2713755
OpenAlexW1982591786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.