ArticleCancer research2009
Development of a multiplex quantitative PCR signature to predict progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in Cancer research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of potential bladder cancer drug targets through Mendelian randomization and molecular docking.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Deciphering riddles in molecular subtyping of bladder cancer.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Stage-stratified molecular profiling of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer enhances biological, clinical, and therapeutic insight.Cell reports. Medicine · 2021Article
- miR-30b-5p acts as a tumor suppressor microRNA in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Identification and validation of an 18-gene signature highly-predictive of bladder cancer metastasis.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Proteomics analysis of bladder cancer invasion: Targeting EIF3D for therapeutic intervention.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Correlation of Apobec Mrna Expression with overall Survival and pd-l1 Expression in Urothelial Carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- What are the currently available and in development molecular markers for bladder cancer? Will they prove to be useful in the future?Turkish journal of urology · 2014Review
- Integrative analysis of 1q23.3 copy-number gain in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014Article
- Clinical significance of survivin expression in patients with urothelial carcinoma.Disease markers · 2014Article
- Analysis of molecular intra-patient variation and delineation of a prognostic 12-gene signature in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; technology transfer from microarrays to PCR.British journal of cancer · 2012Article
- Fetal haemopoiesis marking low-grade urinary bladder cancer.British journal of cancer · 2012Article
- High throughput nano-liter RT-qPCR to classify soil contamination using a soil arthropod.BMC molecular biology · 2011Article
- Identification of C16orf74 as a marker of progression in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.PloS one · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In bladder cancer, clinical grade and stage fail to capture outcome. We developed a clinically applicable quantitative PCR (QPCR) gene signature to predict progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Comparative metaprofiling of 12 DNA microarray data sets (comprising 631 samples and 241,298 probe sets) identified 96 genes, which showed differential expression in seven clinical outcome categories, or were identified as outliers, historic markers, or housekeeping genes. QPCR was done to determine mRNA expression from 96 bladder tumors. Fifty-seven genes differentiated T2 from non-T2 tumors (P < 0.05). Principal components analysis and Cox regression models were used to predict probability of T2 progression for non-T2 patients, placing them into high- and low-risk groups based on their gene expression. At 2 years, high-risk patients exhibited greater T2 progression (45% for high-risk patients versus 12% for low-risk patients; P = 0.003, log-rank test). This difference remained significant within T1 tumors (61% for high-risk patients versus 22% for low-risk patients; P = 0.02) and Ta tumors (29% for high-risk patients versus 0% for low-risk patients; P = 0.03). The best multivariate Cox model included stage and gender, and this signature provided predictive improvement over both (P = 0.002, likelihood ratio test). Immunohistochemistry was done for two genes in the signature not previously described in bladder cancer, ACTN1 and CDC25B, corroborating their up-regulation at the protein level with disease progression. Thus, we identified a 57-gene QPCR panel to help predict progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers and delineate a systematic, generalizable approach to converting microarray data into a multiplex assay for cancer progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.