Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19383766›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2009

The fraction of RNA that folds into the correct branched secondary structure determines hepatitis delta virus type 3 RNA editing levels.

Sarah D Linnstaedt, Wojciech K Kasprzak, Bruce A Shapiro, John L Casey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. MPGAfold in dengue secondary structure prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Article
  5. Control of ADAR1 editing of hepatitis delta virus RNAs.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2012
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  10. Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA, RNA editing, and interferon action.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah D LinnstaedtDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Wojciech K Kasprzak
Bruce A Shapiro
John L Casey
Georgetown University · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Computational Approaches for RNA StructureFunction DeterminationZIABC008382 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SHAPIRO, BRUCE · 2009 to 2021
$5.8M
HEPATITIS DELTA VIRUS RNA EDITINGR01AI042324 · NIAID · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CASEY, JOHN L · 1999 to 2007
$1.9M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS N01 CO012400NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042324NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI42324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA editing by the host RNA adenosine deaminase ADAR1 at the amber/W site of hepatitis delta virus RNA plays a central role in the viral replication cycle by affecting the balance between viral RNA synthesis and packaging. Previously, we found that HDV genotype III (HDV-3) RNA can form two secondary structures following transcription: an unbranched rod structure, which is characteristic of HDV, and a metastable branched structure that serves as the substrate for editing. The unstable nature of the branched editing substrate structure raised the possibility that structural dynamics of the RNA following transcription could determine the rate at which editing occurs. Here, editing and its control are examined in two HDV-3 isolates, from Peru and Ecuador. Analysis of editing in vitro by ADAR1 indicated that the branched structure formed by RNA derived from the Peruvian isolate is edited more efficiently than that from the Ecuadorian isolate. In contrast, in the context of replication, Peruvian RNA is edited less efficiently than RNA containing Ecuadorian sequences. Computational analyses of RNA folding using the massively parallel genetic algorithm (MPGAfold) indicated that the Peruvian RNA is less likely to form the branched structure required for editing than the Ecuadorian isolate. This difference was confirmed by in vitro transcription of these RNAs. Overall, our data indicate that HDV-3 controls RNA editing levels via (1) the fraction of the RNA that folds, during transcription, into the metastable branched structure required for editing and (2) the efficiency with which ADAR1 edits this branched substrate RNA.

Indexed as

Adenosine DeaminaseBase SequenceHepatitis Delta VirusMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA EditingRNA, ViralStructure-Activity RelationshipTransfectionVirus ReplicationADARB1 protein, humanAdenosine DeaminaseRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID19383766
PMCPMC2685515
OpenAlexW2102370992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.