Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19383706›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2009

From a consortium sequence to a unified sequence: the Bacillus subtilis 168 reference genome a decade later.

Valérie Barbe, Stéphane Cruveiller, Frank Kunst, Patricia Lenoble, Guillaume Meurice, Agnieszka Sekowska, David Vallenet, Tingzhang Wang, Ivan Moszer, Claudine Médigue and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 376 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Probiotic properties ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Safety evaluation of the food enzyme subtilisin from the genetically modifiedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rapid and Specific Detection ofACS applied bio materials · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Valérie BarbeCEA, Institut de Génomique, Génoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Évry, France.
Stéphane CruveillerCEA, Institut de Génomique, Laboratoire de Génomique Comparative/CNRS UMR8030, Génoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Évry, France.
Frank KunstCEA, Institut de Génomique, Génoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Évry, France.
Patricia LenobleCEA, Institut de Génomique, Génoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Évry, France.
Guillaume MeuriceInstitut Pasteur, Intégration et Analyse Génomiques, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Agnieszka SekowskaInstitut Pasteur, Génétique des Génomes Bactériens/CNRS URA2171, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
David VallenetCEA, Institut de Génomique, Laboratoire de Génomique Comparative/CNRS UMR8030, Génoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Évry, France.
Tingzhang WangInstitut Pasteur, Génétique des Génomes Bactériens/CNRS URA2171, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Ivan MoszerInstitut Pasteur, Intégration et Analyse Génomiques, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Claudine MédigueCEA, Institut de Génomique, Laboratoire de Génomique Comparative/CNRS UMR8030, Génoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Évry, France.
Antoine DanchinInstitut Pasteur, Génétique des Génomes Bactériens/CNRS URA2171, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Institut Pasteur · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRGenoscope · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genomics is the cornerstone of identification of gene functions. The immense number of living organisms precludes experimental identification of functions except in a handful of model organisms. The bacterial domain is split into large branches, among which the Firmicutes occupy a considerable space. Bacillus subtilis has been the model of Firmicutes for decades and its genome has been a reference for more than 10 years. Sequencing the genome involved more than 30 laboratories, with different expertises, in a attempt to make the most of the experimental information that could be associated with the sequence. This had the expected drawback that the sequencing expertise was quite varied among the groups involved, especially at a time when sequencing genomes was extremely hard work. The recent development of very efficient, fast and accurate sequencing techniques, in parallel with the development of high-level annotation platforms, motivated the present resequencing work. The updated sequence has been reannotated in agreement with the UniProt protein knowledge base, keeping in perspective the split between the paleome (genes necessary for sustaining and perpetuating life) and the cenome (genes required for occupation of a niche, suggesting here that B. subtilis is an epiphyte). This should permit investigators to make reliable inferences to prepare validation experiments in a variety of domains of bacterial growth and development as well as build up accurate phylogenies.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialBacillus subtilisCell CompartmentationDatabases, GeneticEcosystemGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenetic PhenomenaGenetic VariationMetabolismProteomeSequence Analysis, DNAProteome

Identifiers

PMID19383706
PMCPMC2885750
OpenAlexW1981473578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.