Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19383601›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2009

ATP-dependent proteases differ substantially in their ability to unfold globular proteins.

Prakash Koodathingal, Neil E Jaffe, Daniel A Kraut, Sumit Prakash, Susan Fishbain, Christophe Herman, Andreas Matouschek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The AAA+ protein Msp1 recognizes substrates by a hydrophobic mismatch.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mode of targeting to the proteasome determines GFP fate.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  11. Multistep substrate binding and engagement by the AAA+ ClpXP protease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. The Phage-EncodedViruses · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Regulated Proteolysis in Bacteria.Annual review of biochemistry · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effect of directional pulling on mechanical protein degradation by ATP-dependent proteolytic machines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prakash KoodathingalDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.
Neil E Jaffe
Daniel A Kraut
Sumit Prakash
Susan Fishbain
Christophe Herman
Andreas Matouschek

Funding

Protein unfolding in a physiological systemR01GM063004 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MATOUSCHEK, ANDREAS · 2001 to 2012
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063004NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM64003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ATP-dependent proteases control the concentrations of hundreds of regulatory proteins and remove damaged or misfolded proteins from cells. They select their substrates primarily by recognizing sequence motifs or covalent modifications. Once a substrate is bound to the protease, it has to be unfolded and translocated into the proteolytic chamber to be degraded. Some proteases appear to be promiscuous, degrading substrates with poorly defined targeting signals, which suggests that selectivity may be controlled at additional levels. Here we compare the abilities of representatives from all classes of ATP-dependent proteases to unfold a model substrate protein and find that the unfolding abilities range over more than 2 orders of magnitude. We propose that these differences in unfolding abilities contribute to the fates of substrate proteins and may act as a further layer of selectivity during protein destruction.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateATP-Dependent ProteasesBacillusBacterial ProteinsBiochemistryDose-Response Relationship, DrugEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsKineticsProtease LaProtein BindingProtein DenaturationProtein FoldingProtein Structure, TertiaryRibonucleasesThermodynamicsAdenosine TriphosphateATP-Dependent ProteasesBacillus amyloliquefaciens ribonucleaseBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsFtsH protein, E coliLon protein, E coliProtease LaRibonucleases

Identifiers

PMID19383601
PMCPMC2707231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.