ArticleBiophysical journal2009
Structure of a double transmembrane fragment of a G-protein-coupled receptor in micelles.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Paradigm for Peptide Hormone-GPCR Analyses.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Understanding GPCR Recognition and Folding from NMR Studies of Fragments.RSC advances · 2018Article
- NMR Investigation of Structures of G-protein Coupled Receptor Folding Intermediates.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016Article
- Structural characterization of triple transmembrane domain containing fragments of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor in an organic : aqueous environment by solution-state NMR spectroscopy.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2015Article
- Guided reconstitution of membrane protein fragments.Biopolymers · 2014Article
- Comparison of fragments comprising the first two helices of the human Y4 and the yeast Ste2p G-protein-coupled receptors.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- An expression and purification system for the biosynthesis of adenosine receptor peptides for biophysical and structural characterization.Protein expression and purification · 2012Article
- Large multiple transmembrane domain fragments of a G protein-coupled receptor: biosynthesis, purification, and biophysical studies.Biopolymers · 2012Article
- Comparative NMR analysis of an 80-residue G protein-coupled receptor fragment in two membrane mimetic environments.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The structure and dynamic properties of an 80-residue fragment of Ste2p, the G-protein-coupled receptor for alpha-factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, was studied in LPPG micelles with the use of solution NMR spectroscopy. The fragment Ste2p(G31-T110) (TM1-TM2) consisted of 19 residues from the N-terminal domain, the first TM helix (TM1), the first cytoplasmic loop, the second TM helix (TM2), and seven residues from the first extracellular loop. Multidimensional NMR experiments on [(15)N], [(15)N, (13)C], [(15)N, (13)C, (2)H]-labeled TM1-TM2 and on protein fragments selectively labeled at specific amino acid residues or protonated at selected methyl groups resulted in >95% assignment of backbone and side-chain nuclei. The NMR investigation revealed the secondary structure of specific residues of TM1-TM2. TALOS constraints and NOE connectivities were used to calculate a structure for TM1-TM2 that was highlighted by the presence of three alpha-helices encompassing residues 39-47, 49-72, and 80-103, with higher flexibility around the internal Arg(58) site of TM1. RMSD values of individually superimposed helical segments 39-47, 49-72, and 80-103 were 0.25 +/- 0.10 A, 0.40 +/- 0.13 A, and 0.57 +/- 0.19 A, respectively. Several long-range interhelical connectivities supported the folding of TM1-TM2 into a tertiary structure typified by a crossed helix that splays apart toward the extracellular regions and contains considerable flexibility in the G(56)VRSG(60) region. (15)N-relaxation and hydrogen-deuterium exchange data support a stable fold for the TM parts of TM1-TM2, whereas the solvent-exposed segments are more flexible. The NMR structure is consistent with the results of biochemical experiments that identified the ligand-binding site within this region of the receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.