ArticleTransgenic research2009
Enhanced single copy integration events in corn via particle bombardment using low quantities of DNA.
Article in Transgenic research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fine tuning wheat heading time through genome editing of transcription factor binding sites in Ppd-1 gene promoter.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- RNAi and genome editing of sugarcane: Progress and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Anthocyanins in Plant Food: Current Status, Genetic Modification, and Future Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- IMPLANT: a new technique for transgene copy number estimation in plants using a single end-point PCR reaction.Plant methods · 2022Article
- Overexpression ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Modified Gene Editing Systems: Diverse Bioengineering Tools and Crop Improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Transformation of Teosinte (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Multi-Allelic Gene Targeting in Sugarcane Confers Herbicide Tolerance.Frontiers in genome editing · 2021Article
- An improved protocol for efficient transformation and regeneration of Setaria italica.Plant cell reports · 2020Article
- Technological breakthroughs in generating transgene-free and genetically stable CRISPR-edited plants.aBIOTECH · 2020Review
- Generation of a selectable marker free, highly expressed single copy locus as landing pad for transgene stacking in sugarcane.Plant molecular biology · 2019Article
- Factors affecting genetic transformation by particle bombardment of the prickly pear cactus (3 Biotech · 2019Article
- Genome-Scale Sequence Disruption Following Biolistic Transformation in Rice and Maize.The Plant cell · 2019Article
- A biolistic method for high-throughput production of transgenic wheat plants with single gene insertions.BMC plant biology · 2018Article
- Article
- Use of RNAi technology to develop a PRSV-resistant transgenic papaya.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Robust genetic transformation of sorghum (Plant methods · 2017Article
- Advancing Crop Transformation in the Era of Genome Editing.The Plant cell · 2016Review
- Strategies to improve low copy transgenic events in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize.Transgenic research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transgene copy number is an important criterion for determining the utility of transgenic events. Single copy integration events are highly desirable when the objective is to produce marker free plants through segregation or when it is necessary to introgress different transgenes into commercial cultivars from different transgenic events. In contrast multi-copy events are advocated by several authors for higher expression of the transgene. Till recently, it was thought that employment of the particle gun for transformation results in the production of a high proportion of multi-copy events often with complex integration pattern when compared to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. However, it has been demonstrated that usage of cassette DNA for bombardment in place of whole plasmids would result in simple insertion pattern of the transgenes. While investigating the effect of varying the cassette DNA amount on stable transformation, the frequency of occurrence of low copy events was observed to increase when lower doses of cassette DNA was employed for bombardment. Large scale experimentation with rigorous statistical analysis performed to verify the above observations employing Helium gun and the Electric discharge gun for gene delivery confirmed the above observations. Helium gun experiments involving production of more than 1,600 corn events consistently yielded single copy events at higher frequencies at lower cassette DNA load (46% at 2.5 ng/shot) as compared to higher cassette DNA load (29% at 25 ng/shot) across 18 independent experiments. Results were nearly identical with the Electric discharge particle gun device where single copy events were recovered at frequencies of 54% at 2.5 ng cassettes DNA per shot as compared to 18% at 25 ng cassette DNA per shot. The transformation frequency declined from 41 to 34% (Helium gun) and from 48 to 31% (Electric discharge gun) with reduction in cassette DNA quantity from 25 to 2.5 ng per shot. This reduction in the transformation frequency is more than compensated by the savings in time and effort involved in the production and screening of events if the desired outcome is single copy events. These results demonstrate the flexibility of the particle gun method for controlling the frequency of production of either low copy or high copy events by altering the quantity of cassette DNA used for bombardment. The transgene expression levels over generations in relation to its integration need further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19381853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.