ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2009
The role of chemotherapy for pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (AO/mixed-AOs) remain terminal primary brain tumors, without a defined optimal initial therapy, and without sufficiently active and tolerable therapies at recurrence/progression (R/P). Very heterogeneous international therapy recommendations remain. Historical advances have resulted in only modest improvements in outcome. AO/mixed-AOs with 1p/19q co-deletion are prognostically favorable, regardless of therapy, and must be identified as early as possible. Following resection, outcome data on initial therapy with radiation (RT) remain the most mature, although controversies regarding its true toxicities and optimal timing continue. Recently, the landmark RTOG 9402 and EORTC 26951 trials showed that the addition of Procarbazine, CCNU, Vincristine chemotherapy to RT, at anytime during initial therapy, prolongs progression-free survival, but not survival, and not without moderate toxicity. Despite a lack of definitive evidence, this strategy has commonly been extrapolated to Temozolomide. Chemo-sensitivity of AO/mixed-AOs provides the rationale for the chemotherapy-only strategies being explored. In the setting of recurrence/progression (R/P), chemotherapy, small molecule (targeted), biologic, and other strategies have been relatively disappointing, toxic, and cumbersome. Partly secondary to biases regarding the relative toxicities of tumor burden vs. treatment effect, therapy remains highly individualized. Future international research must prospectively evaluate health-related quality of life, toxicity, and molecular genetic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.