Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19381819›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2009

Low-grade gliomas.

Jimmy Ruiz, Glenn J Lesser

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biopsy versus resection for the management of low-grade gliomas.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Prospective assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with low-grade glioma: a single-center experience.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Trial
  3. A perioperative study of Safusidenib in patients withFuture oncology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prognosis of older patients with low-grade glioma: A retrospective study.Integrative cancer science and therapeutics · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jimmy RuizSection of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. jruiz@wfubmc.edu
Glenn J Lesser
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are uncommon central nervous system (CNS) tumors which often present with seizures and few other neurologic signs or symptoms. Multimodality therapy encompassing surgical resection, radiation therapy (RT), and chemotherapy may provide the best disease-free and overall survival (OS). Each of these treatment modalities plays an important role in the treatment of these tumors. The understanding and management of LGG is evolving as randomized clinical trials have begun to address many questions related to the timing and order of each of the available treatments and their individual and combined effects on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Currently, an attempt at surgical resection followed by external beam RT is a typical treatment approach, at least in high-risk patients. Observation with serial brain imaging studies or surgical resection or debulking alone may be acceptable options in patients with low-risk tumors. The role of chemotherapy in either group is less clear, but recent studies have indicated that concurrent chemotherapy with radiation improves PFS and may eventually impact OS. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) are currently conducting two large Phase III and Phase II studies, respectively. The studies seek to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy and either temozolomide or a combination of procarbazine, vincristine, and lomustine in high-risk LGG patients. Ongoing investigative efforts seek to confirm the predictive value of a number of molecular markers including the loss of chromosomes 1p and 19q and the epigenetic silencing of the methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene. Additional smaller clinical trials seek to establish the role of newer targeted therapies including small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent LGG.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChromosome MappingClinical Trials as TopicDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalGliomaHumansMedical OncologyMiddle AgedPrognosisTemozolomideTreatment OutcomeDacarbazineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID19381819
OpenAlexW2090841741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.