Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19381501›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2009

Pediatric hospitalizations at two different setting community hospitals in north India: implications for regionalization of care.

Pankaj Garg

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pankaj GargDepartment of Pediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi, India. pankajparul8@rediffmail.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate pediatric hospitalizations at two different setting community hospitals in north India, and to understand the implications for regionalization of pediatric care in heterogeneous environment of India.

methodsRetrospective review of medical records of children hospitalized at a large and a small community hospital catering to population from different social classes but in close proximity to each other was carried out. Baseline characteristics and diagnosis were recorded, and compared using appropriate statistical tests.

resultsThere were notable differences between the age and morbidity profiles at the two study hospitals. Smaller community hospital catered to more young, malnourished and sicker children. Morbidity profile comprised of significantly more acute gastroenteritis and community-acquired pneumonia at the small hospital. In contrast, almost a quarter (24.4%) of children was injured at the larger community hospital. Infants and newborns were more at small, while older children (>5 yrs) were more at the larger community hospital (p<0.0001).

conclusionThe conclusion drawn from this study is that significant differences exist in age and morbidity profiles between different setting community hospitals in north India. There is a need to form a prospective registry of community hospitals, which would validate the observations of the present study, and has implications for regionalization of specialized pediatric services as well as postgraduate training in India.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospital Bed CapacityHospitalizationHospital MortalityHospitals, CommunityHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMorbidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.