Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19381473›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2008

Serological and molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasmataceae in rodents.

A Stefancíková, M Derdáková, D Lencáková, R Ivanová, M Stanko, L Cisláková, B Petko

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular detection and characterization ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of wildlife in the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases in Slovakia.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A StefancíkováDepartment of Natural Foci Diseases, Parasitological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovakia. astefan@saske.sk
M Derdáková
D Lencáková
R Ivanová
M Stanko
L Cisláková
B Petko

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of Anaplasma spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in rodents from Eastern Slovakia were followed by serological and molecular methods. The seroprevalence for Borrelia was detected in 16.6 %, for Anaplasmataceae (APT) in 13.2 % and co-occurrence of Borrelia and APT in 7.5 %. Out of 110 ear biopsies of rodents, 5 were B. afzelii-positive. Five biopsies tested positive with the Ehr521-Ehr747 primers amplifying all the members of the family APT. A. phagocytophilum was detected in 1.8 %, 2.7 % were infected with Anaplasma-like organisms. Co-occurrence of Borrelia and Anaplasma in ear biopsies was found in 1.8 %. The circulation of both Borrelia and Anaplasma in the region of Eastern Slovakia was confirmed.

Indexed as

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthAnaplasmataceaeAnaplasmataceae InfectionsAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialArvicolinaeBorrelia burgdorferi GroupDisease ReservoirsDNA, BacterialEar, ExternalLyme DiseaseMiceMolecular Sequence DataMurinaeAntibodies, BacterialDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.