ArticleJournal of applied physics2007
Experimentally validated quantitative linear model for the device physics of elastomeric microfluidic valves.
Article in Journal of applied physics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Solution to the Clearance Problem of Sacrificial Material in 3D Printing of Microfluidic Devices.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Review
- Energy Saving and Energy Generation Smart Window with Active Control and Antifreezing Functions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Polycaprolactone-enabled sealing and carbon composite electrode integration into electrochemical microfluidics.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- Analysis of Membrane Behavior of a Normally Closed Microvalve Using a Fluid-Structure Interaction Model.Micromachines · 2017Article
- Multi-step Variable Height Photolithography for Valved Multilayer Microfluidic Devices.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- A Review of Heating and Temperature Control in Microfluidic Systems: Techniques and Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013Review
- Quantitative modeling of the behaviour of microfluidic autoregulatory devices.Lab on a chip · 2012Article
- Design rules for pumping and metering of highly viscous fluids in microfluidics.Lab on a chip · 2010Article
- The effect of flap parameters on fluid rectification in a microfluidic diode.Biomicrofluidics · 2010Article
- Elastomeric microfluidic diode and rectifier work with Newtonian fluids.Journal of applied physics · 2009Article
- Electrical microfluidic pressure gauge for elastomer microelectromechanical systems.Journal of applied physics · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A systematic experimental study and theoretical modeling of the device physics of polydimethylsiloxane "pushdown" microfluidic valves are presented. The phase space is charted by 1587 dimension combinations and encompasses 45-295 μm lateral dimensions, 16-39 μm membrane thickness, and 1-28 psi closing pressure. Three linear models are developed and tested against the empirical data, and then combined into a fourth-power-polynomial superposition. The experimentally validated final model offers a useful quantitative prediction for a valve's properties as a function of its dimensions. Typical valves (80-150 μm width) are shown to behave like thin springs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.