Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19381255›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

Rapid and accurate multiple testing correction and power estimation for millions of correlated markers.

Buhm Han, Hyun Min Kang, Eleazar Eskin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Imputing Phenotypes for Genome-wide Association Studies.American journal of human genetics · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Form and function of actin impacts actin health and aging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identification of genetic variants affecting reproduction traits in Vrindavani cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Buhm HanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Hyun Min Kang
Eleazar Eskin

Funding

VISUALIZATION TOOLS FOR AUTOMATED MOLECULAR MICROSCOPYP41RR008605 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAPADOPOULOS, PHILIP · 1994 to 2011
$28.1M
INFRASTRUCTURE OF BIOENGINEERING DEVELOPMENTC06RR017588 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI GOUGH, DAVID A · 2002 to 2002
$696k
Discovering the Genetic Basis of HypertensionK25HL080079 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ESKIN, ELEAZAR · 2006 to 2010
$685k
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR017588NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008605NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR08605NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL080079NHLBI NIH HHS K25HL080079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of high-throughput sequencing and genotyping technologies, the number of markers collected in genetic association studies is growing rapidly, increasing the importance of methods for correcting for multiple hypothesis testing. The permutation test is widely considered the gold standard for accurate multiple testing correction, but it is often computationally impractical for these large datasets. Recently, several studies proposed efficient alternative approaches to the permutation test based on the multivariate normal distribution (MVN). However, they cannot accurately correct for multiple testing in genome-wide association studies for two reasons. First, these methods require partitioning of the genome into many disjoint blocks and ignore all correlations between markers from different blocks. Second, the true null distribution of the test statistic often fails to follow the asymptotic distribution at the tails of the distribution. We propose an accurate and efficient method for multiple testing correction in genome-wide association studies--SLIDE. Our method accounts for all correlation within a sliding window and corrects for the departure of the true null distribution of the statistic from the asymptotic distribution. In simulations using the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium data, the error rate of SLIDE's corrected p-values is more than 20 times smaller than the error rate of the previous MVN-based methods' corrected p-values, while SLIDE is orders of magnitude faster than the permutation test and other competing methods. We also extend the MVN framework to the problem of estimating the statistical power of an association study with correlated markers and propose an efficient and accurate power estimation method SLIP. SLIP and SLIDE are available at http://slide.cs.ucla.edu.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyComputer SimulationGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID19381255
PMCPMC2663787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.