ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009
Piperaquine pharmacodynamics and parasite viability in a murine malaria model.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Superior Pyronaridine Single-Dose Pharmacodynamics Compared to Artesunate, Chloroquine, and Amodiaquine in a Murine Malaria Luciferase Model.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Article
- Modelling the time course of antimalarial parasite killing: a tour of animal and human models, translation and challenges.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Review
- Treatment of murine cerebral malaria by artemisone in combination with conventional antimalarial drugs: antiplasmodial effects and immune responses.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014Article
- Mechanism-based model of parasite growth and dihydroartemisinin pharmacodynamics in murine malaria.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2013Article
- Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and allometric scaling of chloroquine in a murine malaria model.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Piperaquine (PQ) is an important partner drug in antimalarial combination treatments, but the long half-life of PQ raises concerns about drug resistance. Our aim was to investigate the extended antimalarial effect of PQ in a study of drug efficacy, reinoculation outcomes, and parasite viability after the administration of a single dose of PQ in the murine malaria model. Initially, male Swiss mice were inoculated with Plasmodium berghei and at 64 h after parasite inoculation were given PQ phosphate at 90 mg/kg of body weight intraperitoneally. Parasite viability, drug efficacy, reinoculation responses, and parasite resistance were determined at 25, 40, 60, 90, and 130 days after drug administration. At each time point, six mice were reinoculated with 10(7) P. berghei parasites and blood was harvested from another four mice for viability passage into naïve mice (n = 5 for each blood sample) and from another two mice for determination of the plasma PQ concentration. The efficacy study demonstrated that the residual PQ concentrations did not suppress the infection after 25 days. Viable parasites were present up to 90 days after PQ dosing, although only 50% and 25% of the passaged parasites remained viable at 60 and 90 days postdosing, respectively. Viable parasites passaged into the naïve hosts were generally resistant to PQ when they were exposed to the drug for a second time. PQ was found to have a substantial antimalarial effect in this model, and the effect appears to be sufficient for a host immunological response to be established, resulting in the long-term survival of P. berghei-infected mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.