Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19380315›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2009

CellML metadata standards, associated tools and repositories.

Daniel A Beard, Randall Britten, Mike T Cooling, Alan Garny, Matt D B Halstead, Peter J Hunter, James Lawson, Catherine M Lloyd, Justin Marsh, Andrew Miller and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Towards the virtual artery: a multiscale model for vascular physiology at the physics-chemistry-biology interface.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using CellML with OpenCMISS to Simulate Multi-Scale Physiology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Verification of cardiac tissue electrophysiology simulators using an N-version benchmark.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Module-based multiscale simulation of angiogenesis in skeletal muscle.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Daniel A BeardDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Randall Britten
Mike T Cooling
Alan Garny
Matt D B Halstead
Peter J Hunter
James Lawson
Catherine M Lloyd
Justin Marsh
Andrew Miller
David P Nickerson
Poul M F Nielsen
Taishin Nomura
Shankar Subramanium
Sarala M Wimalaratne
Tommy Yu

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of standards for encoding mathematical models is an important component of model building and model sharing among scientists interested in understanding multi-scale physiological processes. CellML provides such a standard, particularly for models based on biophysical mechanisms, and a substantial number of models are now available in the CellML Model Repository. However, there is an urgent need to extend the current CellML metadata standard to provide biological and biophysical annotation of the models in order to facilitate model sharing, automated model reduction and connection to biological databases. This paper gives a broad overview of a number of new developments on CellML metadata and provides links to further methodological details available from the CellML website.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDatabase Management SystemsProgramming LanguagesBiophysics

Identifiers

PMID19380315
PMCPMC3268215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.