Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19378258›Full record

ReviewThe International journal of developmental biology2009

Genomic control of patterning.

Isabelle S Peter, Eric H Davidson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal of developmental biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Paleogenomics of echinoids reveals an ancient origin for the double-negative specification of micromeres in sea urchins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter expression and localization in sea urchin development.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Functional cis-regulatory genomics for systems biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  12. Network design principles from the sea urchin embryo.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2009
    Review
  13. Pattern formation today.The International journal of developmental biology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isabelle S PeterCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, USA. ipeter@caltech.edu
Eric H Davidson

Funding

Transcriptional Casualty in Embryonic Morphogenesis: from the Specifications GRNP01HD037105 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DAVIDSON, ERIC H · 1999 to 2018
$27.1M
NICHD NIH HHS HD37105NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD037105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of multicellular organisms involves the partitioning of the organism into territories of cells of specific structure and function. The information for spatial patterning processes is directly encoded in the genome. The genome determines its own usage depending on stage and position, by means of interactions that constitute gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The GRN driving endomesoderm development in sea urchin embryos illustrates different regulatory strategies by which developmental programs are initiated, orchestrated, stabilized or excluded to define the pattern of specified territories in the developing embryo.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsBody PatterningBone and BonesDevelopmental BiologyEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianEndodermGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksGenomeMesodermModels, BiologicalSea Urchins

Identifiers

PMID19378258
PMCPMC3967875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.