Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19377050›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2009

Neostigmine decreases bupivacaine use by patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized controlled study.

Vernon H Ross, Peter H Pan, Medge D Owen, Melvin H Seid, Lynne Harris, Brittany Clyne, Misa Voltaire, James C Eisenach

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04564326 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Block for Pre- and Post-Operative Analgesia in Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture

TypeinterventionalSponsorZagazig UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled51ConditionsHip FracturesArmsPericapsular nerve Group block, Facia Iliaca block, Fentanyl
NCT06410378 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Serratus Anterior Block for Perioperative Analgesia In Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorZagazig UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled75ConditionsMastectomy, Postoperative PainArmsErector Spinae Plane Block, Serratus Anterior Plane Block, controll group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vernon H RossDepartments of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, North Carolina 27157, USA.
Peter H Pan
Medge D Owen
Melvin H Seid
Lynne Harris
Brittany Clyne
Misa Voltaire
James C Eisenach
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF SELECTIVE SPINAL ANALGESIA IN HUMANSR01GM048085 · NIGMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EISENACH, JAMES · 1992 to 2010
$4.1M
Receptor Selective Spinal AnalgesiaR37GM048085 · NIGMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EISENACH, JAMES · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM48085NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048085NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM048085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrathecal neostigmine not only produces analgesia but also severe nausea. In contrast, epidural neostigmine enhances opioid and local anesthetic analgesia without causing nausea. Previous studies examined only single epidural neostigmine bolus administration and did not assess the efficacy of continuous epidural infusion or several aspects of maternal and fetal safety. We therefore tested the hypothesis that epidural neostigmine in combination with bupivacaine by continuous infusion during labor would reduce the amount of bupivacaine required.

methodsTwelve healthy women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were assigned to receive epidural neostigmine, 40 microg (first six subjects) or 80 microg (second six subjects) as a single bolus, with fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contractions monitored for 20 min. In a subsequent experiment, 40 healthy laboring women were randomized to receive bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL alone or with neostigmine 4 microg/mL by patient-controlled epidural analgesia. The primary outcome measure was hourly bupivacaine use.

resultsEpidural neostigmine bolus did not alter baseline FHR, induce contractions, or produce nausea. Epidural neostigmine infusion reduced bupivacaine requirement by 19% in all patients and 25% in those with >4 h of treatment (P < 0.05 for both) but might have contributed to the incidence of mild sedation. Mode of delivery, incidence of maternal nausea, and FHR abnormality were similar between groups.

conclusionsThese data show that adding epidural neostigmine 4 microg/mL reduces the hourly bupivacaine requirement by 19%-25% with patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Administered as a bolus and by continuous infusion at the studied doses, epidural neostigmine does not cause nausea and does not induce uterine contractions or FHR abnormalities, but mild sedation can occur.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledAnesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, ObstetricalCholinesterase InhibitorsNeostigmineAdultAnesthetics, LocalBlood PressureBupivacaineCesarean SectionData Interpretation, StatisticalDouble-Blind MethodElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHeart Rate, FetalHumansAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineCholinesterase InhibitorsNeostigmine

Identifiers

PMID19377050
PMCPMC2843405
OpenAlexW2047704187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.