Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2009
Neostigmine decreases bupivacaine use by patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Block for Pre- and Post-Operative Analgesia in Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Serratus Anterior Block for Perioperative Analgesia In Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy Surgery
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal single-dose epidural neostigmine for postoperative analgesia after partial hepatectomy.Indian journal of pharmacologyTrial
- Article
- Can Epidural Dexamethasone Reduce Patient-Controlled Epidural Consumption of Fentanyl and Levobupivacaine in Laboring Women? A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2019Article
- The evolution of spinal/epidural neostigmine in clinical application: Thoughts after two decades.Saudi journal of anaesthesia · 2015Review
- Comparison between the intravenous and caudal routes of sufentanil in children undergoing orchidopexy and further evaluation of the association of caudal adrenaline and neostigmine.Saudi journal of anaesthesia · 2014Article
- Epidural Infusion of Morphine and Levobupivacaine through a Subcutaneous Port for Cancer Pain Management.The Korean journal of pain · 2014Article
- Postoperative analgesic effect of epidural neostigmine following caesarean section.Hippokratia · 2014Article
- A randomized comparison of epidural, dural puncture epidural, and combined spinal-epidural without intrathecal opioids for labor analgesia.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntrathecal neostigmine not only produces analgesia but also severe nausea. In contrast, epidural neostigmine enhances opioid and local anesthetic analgesia without causing nausea. Previous studies examined only single epidural neostigmine bolus administration and did not assess the efficacy of continuous epidural infusion or several aspects of maternal and fetal safety. We therefore tested the hypothesis that epidural neostigmine in combination with bupivacaine by continuous infusion during labor would reduce the amount of bupivacaine required.
methodsTwelve healthy women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were assigned to receive epidural neostigmine, 40 microg (first six subjects) or 80 microg (second six subjects) as a single bolus, with fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contractions monitored for 20 min. In a subsequent experiment, 40 healthy laboring women were randomized to receive bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL alone or with neostigmine 4 microg/mL by patient-controlled epidural analgesia. The primary outcome measure was hourly bupivacaine use.
resultsEpidural neostigmine bolus did not alter baseline FHR, induce contractions, or produce nausea. Epidural neostigmine infusion reduced bupivacaine requirement by 19% in all patients and 25% in those with >4 h of treatment (P < 0.05 for both) but might have contributed to the incidence of mild sedation. Mode of delivery, incidence of maternal nausea, and FHR abnormality were similar between groups.
conclusionsThese data show that adding epidural neostigmine 4 microg/mL reduces the hourly bupivacaine requirement by 19%-25% with patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Administered as a bolus and by continuous infusion at the studied doses, epidural neostigmine does not cause nausea and does not induce uterine contractions or FHR abnormalities, but mild sedation can occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.